These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE, Rohrschneider K. Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Perimetry update. Leydhecker W. Ann Ophthalmol; 1983 Jun; 15(6):511-5, 520-1, 524-6 passim. PubMed ID: 6571428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter]. Gramer E, Althaus G. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Sep; 191(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 3682683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry]. Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]