These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


123 related items for PubMed ID: 38394442

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
    Skjerven H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, Ellingsen JE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides.
    Cunha RM, Souza FÁ, Hadad H, Poli PP, Maiorana C, Carvalho PSP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical accuracy of partially guided implant placement in edentulous patients: A computed tomography-based retrospective study.
    Wang B, Yang J, Siow L, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Yu M, Wang H.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 37814971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using Implant Studio and MGUIDE. An observational study.
    Fotopoulos I, Lillis T, Panagiotidou E, Kapagiannidis I, Nazaroglou I, Dabarakis N.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep 20; 25(3):249-256. PubMed ID: 35072419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation.
    Böse MWH, Beuer F, Schwitalla A, Bruhnke M, Herklotz I.
    J Dent; 2022 Oct 20; 125():104265. PubMed ID: 35995082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of a guided implant system with milled surgical templates.
    Li-Rodríguez JK, Díaz-Durany M, Romeo-Rubio M, Paz Salido M, Pradíes G.
    J Oral Sci; 2022 Apr 01; 64(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 35321962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery.
    He J, Zhang Q, Wang X, Fu M, Zhang H, Song L, Pu R, Jiang Z, Yang G.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr 01; 26(2):385-401. PubMed ID: 38214435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.