These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 38396213

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories.
    Bori L, Meseguer F, Valera MA, Galan A, Remohi J, Meseguer M.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May 30; 37(6):1148-1160. PubMed ID: 35435210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.
    Storr A, Venetis CA, Cooke S, Kilani S, Ledger W.
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb 30; 32(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28031323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.
    Salih M, Austin C, Warty RR, Tiktin C, Rolnik DL, Momeni M, Rezatofighi H, Reddy S, Smith V, Vollenhoven B, Horta F.
    Hum Reprod Open; 2023 Feb 30; 2023(3):hoad031. PubMed ID: 37588797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.
    Diakiw SM, Hall JMM, VerMilyea MD, Amin J, Aizpurua J, Giardini L, Briones YG, Lim AYX, Dakka MA, Nguyen TV, Perugini D, Perugini M.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul 30; 37(8):1746-1759. PubMed ID: 35674312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?
    Barberet J, Bruno C, Valot E, Antunes-Nunes C, Jonval L, Chammas J, Choux C, Ginod P, Sagot P, Soudry-Faure A, Fauque P.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug 01; 34(8):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 31287145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Generative artificial intelligence to produce high-fidelity blastocyst-stage embryo images.
    Cao P, Derhaag J, Coonen E, Brunner H, Acharya G, Salumets A, Zamani Esteki M.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun 03; 39(6):1197-1207. PubMed ID: 38600621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.
    Petersen BM, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner DK.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct 03; 31(10):2231-44. PubMed ID: 27609980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A hybrid artificial intelligence model leverages multi-centric clinical data to improve fetal heart rate pregnancy prediction across time-lapse systems.
    Duval A, Nogueira D, Dissler N, Maskani Filali M, Delestro Matos F, Chansel-Debordeaux L, Ferrer-Buitrago M, Ferrer E, Antequera V, Ruiz-Jorro M, Papaxanthos A, Ouchchane H, Keppi B, Prima PY, Regnier-Vigouroux G, Trebesses L, Geoffroy-Siraudin C, Zaragoza S, Scalici E, Sanguinet P, Cassagnard N, Ozanon C, De La Fuente A, Gómez E, Gervoise Boyer M, Boyer P, Ricciarelli E, Pollet-Villard X, Boussommier-Calleja A.
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr 03; 38(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 36763673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.
    Kirkegaard K, Sundvall L, Erlandsen M, Hindkjær JJ, Knudsen UB, Ingerslev HJ.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb 03; 31(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 26637491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.
    Hammond ER, Foong AKM, Rosli N, Morbeck DE.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 May 01; 35(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 32358601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Impact of letrozole co-treatment during ovarian stimulation on oocyte yield, embryo development, and live birth rate in women with normal ovarian reserve: secondary outcomes from the RIOT trial.
    Bülow NS, Warzecha AK, Nielsen MV, Andersen CY, Holt MD, Petersen MR, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Englund AL, Pinborg A, Grøndahl ML, Skouby SO, Macklon NS.
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov 02; 38(11):2154-2165. PubMed ID: 37699851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.
    Tran D, Cooke S, Illingworth PJ, Gardner DK.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun 04; 34(6):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 31111884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
    Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, Spinella F, Fiorentino F, Varricchio MT, Greco E.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct 04; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Perinatal outcomes in singleton live births after fresh blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of 67 147 IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Marconi N, Raja EA, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep 29; 34(9):1716-1725. PubMed ID: 31418775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.