These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 38396304

  • 1. Stomatal response to VPD is not triggered by changes in soil-leaf hydraulic conductance in Arabidopsis or Callitris.
    Bourbia I, Brodribb TJ.
    New Phytol; 2024 Apr; 242(2):444-452. PubMed ID: 38396304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil-root hydraulic resistance.
    Abdalla M, Carminati A, Cai G, Javaux M, Ahmed MA.
    Plant Cell Environ; 2021 Feb; 44(2):425-431. PubMed ID: 33150971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid.
    Rogiers SY, Greer DH, Hatfield JM, Hutton RJ, Clarke SJ, Hutchinson PA, Somers A.
    Tree Physiol; 2012 Mar; 32(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 22199014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dynamic soil hydraulic resistance regulates stomata.
    Manandhar A, Rimer IM, Soares Pereira T, Pichaco J, Rockwell FE, McAdam SAM.
    New Phytol; 2024 Oct; 244(1):147-158. PubMed ID: 39096020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Stomatal closure during water deficit is controlled by below-ground hydraulics.
    Abdalla M, Ahmed MA, Cai G, Wankmüller F, Schwartz N, Litig O, Javaux M, Carminati A.
    Ann Bot; 2022 Jan 28; 129(2):161-170. PubMed ID: 34871349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Natural variation in stomatal response to closing stimuli among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions after exposure to low VPD as a tool to recognize the mechanism of disturbed stomatal functioning.
    Aliniaeifard S, van Meeteren U.
    J Exp Bot; 2014 Dec 28; 65(22):6529-42. PubMed ID: 25205580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Stomatal action directly feeds back on leaf turgor: new insights into the regulation of the plant water status from non-invasive pressure probe measurements.
    Ache P, Bauer H, Kollist H, Al-Rasheid KA, Lautner S, Hartung W, Hedrich R.
    Plant J; 2010 Jun 01; 62(6):1072-82. PubMed ID: 20345603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Stomatal conductance tracks soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance in faba bean and maize during soil drying.
    Müllers Y, Postma JA, Poorter H, van Dusschoten D.
    Plant Physiol; 2022 Nov 28; 190(4):2279-2294. PubMed ID: 36099023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure deficit reflect tissue-specific differences in hydraulic conductance.
    Ocheltree TW, Nippert JB, Prasad PV.
    Plant Cell Environ; 2014 Jan 28; 37(1):132-9. PubMed ID: 23701708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.