These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 38416155

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMJ; 2015 Jul 23; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Letter to "Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher".
    Yavuz O, Karaca İ.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul 23; 35(7):1555. PubMed ID: 38963504
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension or Uphold™ hysteropexy in women with apical prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Kulkarni M, Young N, Lee J, Rosamilia A.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct 23; 31(10):2137-2146. PubMed ID: 32468174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vaginal hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A 5-year cost-effectiveness Markov model.
    Wallace SL, Syan R, Lee K, Sokol ER.
    BJOG; 2024 Feb 23; 131(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 37667669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
    Rahmanou P, Price N, Jackson SR.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov 23; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy.
    Lo TS, Pue LB, Hung TH, Wu PY, Tan YL.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jul 23; 41(7):1099-107. PubMed ID: 25808989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study.
    Vermeulen CKM, Veen J, Adang C, van Leijsen SAL, Coolen AWM, Bongers MY.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr 23; 32(4):841-850. PubMed ID: 33170314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.