These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


124 related items for PubMed ID: 38416864

  • 1. Cell-Free Microbial DNA Analysis: Effects of Blood Plasma and Serum Quantity, Biobanking Protocols, and Isolation Kits.
    Nikitina D, Lukosevicius R, Tilinde D, Muskieta T, Hov JR, Melum E, Klovins J, Org E, Kiudelis G, Kupcinskas J, Skieceviciene J.
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2024 Aug; 22(4):363-372. PubMed ID: 38416864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of commercial kits for purification of circulating free DNA.
    Diefenbach RJ, Lee JH, Kefford RF, Rizos H.
    Cancer Genet; 2018 Dec; 228-229():21-27. PubMed ID: 30553469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. DNA extraction method influences human milk bacterial profiles.
    Cheema AS, Stinson LF, Lai CT, Geddes DT, Payne MS.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 130(1):142-156. PubMed ID: 32654260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of whole blood RNA preservation tubes and novel generation RNA extraction kits for analysis of mRNA and MiRNA profiles.
    Häntzsch M, Tolios A, Beutner F, Nagel D, Thiery J, Teupser D, Holdt LM.
    PLoS One; 2014 Jan; 9(12):e113298. PubMed ID: 25469788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
    Isokääntä H, Tomnikov N, Vanhatalo S, Munukka E, Huovinen P, Hakanen AJ, Kallonen T.
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun 04; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction and PCR product purification methods for cervicovaginal microbiome analysis using cpn60 microbial profiling.
    Shvartsman E, Richmond MEI, Schellenberg JJ, Lamont A, Perciani C, Russell JNH, Poliquin V, Burgener A, Jaoko W, Sandstrom P, MacDonald KS.
    PLoS One; 2022 Jun 04; 17(1):e0262355. PubMed ID: 35025956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optimization of Preanalytical Variables for cfDNA Processing and Detection of ctDNA in Archival Plasma Samples.
    Nesic M, Bødker JS, Terp SK, Dybkær K.
    Biomed Res Int; 2021 Jun 04; 2021():5585148. PubMed ID: 34307658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
    Lim MY, Park YS, Kim JH, Nam YD.
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jul 17; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32680572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
    Kennedy NA, Walker AW, Berry SH, Duncan SH, Farquarson FM, Louis P, Thomson JM, UK IBD Genetics Consortium, Satsangi J, Flint HJ, Parkhill J, Lees CW, Hold GL.
    PLoS One; 2014 Jul 17; 9(2):e88982. PubMed ID: 24586470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of two commercial DNA extraction kits and PCR master mixes for the detection of Brucella from blood samples and blood culture bottles].
    Dal T, Açıkgöz ZC, Başyiğit T, Zeybek H, Durmaz R.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2018 Apr 17; 52(2):135-146. PubMed ID: 29933731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A practical and novel method to extract genomic DNA from blood collection kits for plasma protein preservation.
    Waters J, Dhere V, Benjamin A, Sekar A, Kumar A, Prahalad S, Okou DT, Kugathasan S.
    J Vis Exp; 2013 May 18; (75):e4241. PubMed ID: 23711730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction.
    Mirsepasi H, Persson S, Struve C, Andersen LO, Petersen AM, Krogfelt KA.
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Jan 21; 7():50. PubMed ID: 24447346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Performance comparison of commercial kits for isolating and detecting circulating tumor DNA.
    Wang M, Huang X, Li X, Guo Q, Xu W, Zhao M, Wang X, Wang L, Lou J.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2021 Jul 21; 81(4):276-281. PubMed ID: 33999736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Optimizing 16S rRNA gene profile analysis from low biomass nasopharyngeal and induced sputum specimens.
    Claassen-Weitz S, Gardner-Lubbe S, Mwaikono KS, du Toit E, Zar HJ, Nicol MP.
    BMC Microbiol; 2020 May 12; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32397992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.
    Ariefdjohan MW, Savaiano DA, Nakatsu CH.
    Nutr J; 2010 May 22; 9():23. PubMed ID: 20492702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of Streck BCT and PAXgene Stabilised Blood Collection Tubes for Cell-Free Circulating DNA Studies in Plasma.
    Warton K, Yuwono NL, Cowley MJ, McCabe MJ, So A, Ford CE.
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Oct 22; 21(5):563-570. PubMed ID: 28631163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.