These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
196 related items for PubMed ID: 38424224
1. Comparison of efficacy of thermoplastic retainer with round and rectangular bonded lingual wire retainer in the mandible two years after orthodontic treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Kanizaj Ugrin S, Špalj S. Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar 01; 28(3):183. PubMed ID: 38424224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers. Arash V, Teimoorian M, Farajzadeh Jalali Y, Sheikhzadeh S. Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun 29; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA. Eur J Orthod; 1997 Oct 29; 19(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 9386336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival of maxillary and mandibular bonded retainers 10 to 15 years after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective observational study. Kocher KE, Gebistorf MC, Pandis N, Fudalej PS, Katsaros C. Prog Orthod; 2019 Jul 22; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 31328248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers. Paolone MG, Kaitsas R, Obach P, Kaitsas V, Benedicenti S, Sorrenti E, Barberis F. Int Orthod; 2015 Jun 22; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul 27; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative assessment of failures and periodontal health between 2 mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial. Węgrodzka E, Kornatowska K, Pandis N, Fudalej PS. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct 27; 160(4):494-502.e1. PubMed ID: 34384638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial. Sonesson M, Naraghi S, Bondemark L. Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar 30; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial". Nagani NI, Ahmed I, Tanveer F, Khursheed HM, Farooqui WA. BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun 29; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers. Eroglu AK, Baka ZM, Arslan U. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug 29; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. O'Rourke N, Albeedh H, Sharma P, Johal A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep 29; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial. Alrawas MB, Kashoura Y, Tosun Ö, Öz U. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 May 29; 24(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 32865325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers. Lee KD, Mills CM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr 29; 135(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 19361737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]