These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Adverse reactions during intravenous urography: are these due to histamine release? Herd CM, Robertson AR, Frewin DB, Taylor WB. Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):5-11. PubMed ID: 2450612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent. Spataro RF, Katzberg RW, Fischer HW, McMannis MJ. Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 3538156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [In vivo biochemical aspects of adverse reactions of contrast media--sequential changes of histamine, cyclic AMP, cyclic GMP]. Kuwatsuru R. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 May 25; 50(5):477-89. PubMed ID: 2167463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pain during angiography: a randomized double-blind trial comparing ioxaglate and diatrizoate. Pathria M, Somers S, Gill G. Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Mar 25; 38(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2953734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography. Sacks BA, Ellison HP, Bartek S, Vine HS, Palestrant AM. Invest Radiol; 1984 Mar 25; 19(6 Suppl):S320-2. PubMed ID: 6392159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. Svenson RH. Invest Radiol; 1984 Mar 25; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]