These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 38493576

  • 1. Inter-trial variability is higher in 3D markerless compared to marker-based motion capture: Implications for data post-processing and analysis.
    Horsak B, Prock K, Krondorfer P, Siragy T, Simonlehner M, Dumphart B.
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112049. PubMed ID: 38493576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Markerless motion capture provides repeatable gait outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
    Outerleys J, Mihic A, Keller V, Laende E, Deluzio K.
    J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112115. PubMed ID: 38663111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Applications of markerless motion capture in gait recognition.
    Sandau M.
    Dan Med J; 2016 Mar; 63(3):. PubMed ID: 26931198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy, Validity, and Reliability of Markerless Camera-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems versus Marker-Based 3D Motion Capture Systems in Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Scataglini S, Abts E, Van Bocxlaer C, Van den Bussche M, Meletani S, Truijen S.
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun 06; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 38894476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system.
    Kanko RM, Laende EK, Strutzenberger G, Brown M, Selbie WS, DePaul V, Scott SH, Deluzio KJ.
    J Biomech; 2021 Jun 09; 122():110414. PubMed ID: 33915475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients.
    Wren TAL, Isakov P, Rethlefsen SA.
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jul 09; 104():9-14. PubMed ID: 37285635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A Step Forward Understanding Directional Limitations in Markerless Smartphone-Based Gait Analysis: A Pilot Study.
    Martiš P, Košutzká Z, Kranzl A.
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 May 13; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 38793945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Agreement between a markerless and a marker-based motion capture systems for balance related quantities.
    Chaumeil A, Lahkar BK, Dumas R, Muller A, Robert T.
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar 13; 165():112018. PubMed ID: 38412623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture systems using 95% functional limits of agreement in a linear mixed-effects modelling framework.
    Das K, de Paula Oliveira T, Newell J.
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec 18; 13(1):22880. PubMed ID: 38129434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.