These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 3856287

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
    Thüer U, Ingervall B, Vuillemin T.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.
    Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Lyberg T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):368-81. PubMed ID: 11298310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement.
    Keeling SD, Dolce C, Van Sickels JE, Bays RA, Clark GM, Rugh JD.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 10842106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. How the lower face soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement or setback.
    Alves PV, Mazucheli J, Vogel CJ, Bolognese AM.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 May; 19(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 18520370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mandibular advancement surgery: stability following a modified fixation technique.
    Reitzik M.
    J Oral Surg; 1980 Dec; 38(12):893-7. PubMed ID: 7003076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement surgery: predictability and long-term outcome.
    Mobarak KA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Lyberg T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):353-67. PubMed ID: 11298309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Long-term stability of surgical class III treatment: a study of 5-year postsurgical results.
    Busby BR, Bailey LJ, Proffit WR, Phillips C, White RP.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002 Apr; 17(3):159-70. PubMed ID: 12353934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Kaczynski R, Shunock M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
    Chou JI, Fong HJ, Kuang SH, Gi LY, Hwang FY, Lai YC, Chang RC, Kao SY.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
    Eggensperger N, Smolka K, Luder J, Iizuka T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
    Eggensperger NM, Lieger O, Thüer U, Iizuka T.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Morphological study of changes in skeletal Class III faces following sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy. Evaluation using CDS with the line drawing processing system].
    Soya T.
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Mar; 45(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 3458840
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
    Kuroda S, Murakami K, Morishige Y, Takano-Yamamoto T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G, Cura N, Emekli U.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Stability of sagittal split advancement osteotomy: single- versus double-jaw surgery.
    Ayoub AF, Stirrups DR, Moos KF.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995 Jan; 10(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 9082006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Nature of relapse after surgical mandibular advancement.
    Bhatia SN, Yan B, Behbehani I, Harris M.
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Apr; 12(2):58-69. PubMed ID: 3859327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F, Robiony M, Sembronio S, Polini F, Politi M.
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001 Apr; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D, Johnston C, Kennedy D, Harradine N, Stevenson M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.