These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study. Ke Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Chen H, Sun Y. J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of different surface locking patterns on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study. Kondakji E, Lawand G, Yaacoub W, Tohme H. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Sep; 132(3):601.e1-601.e9. PubMed ID: 38918157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Trueness of intraoral scanning of edentulous arches: A comparative clinical study. Al Hamad KQ, Al-Kaff FT. J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 35997079 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study. Knechtle N, Wiedemeier D, Mehl A, Ender A. J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 33612335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of splinting scan bodies or incorporating three-dimensionally printed scan aids on the trueness of complete arch digital scans. Bader Eddin MB, Önöral Ö. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct; 132(4):828.e1-828.e12. PubMed ID: 39068039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. Ochoa-López G, Cascos R, Antonaya-Martín JL, Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M. J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]