These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 3860657

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.
    Boushell LW, Ritter AV.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Leidal TI, Dahl JE.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1980; 38(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 6929645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R, Manhart J.
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH.
    J Adhes Dent; 1999 Jul; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical behaviour of high-copper amalgams with time, site, size and class of cavity preparation.
    Smales RJ, Gerke DC, Hume WR.
    J Dent; 1990 Feb; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2312889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of different metal restorations bonded with resin on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Costa LC, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 9104712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U, Eronen AK, Vehkalahti K, Vehkalahti MM.
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Radiographic assessments of Class II resin composite inlays.
    Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Akerboom HB, Gruythuysen RJ.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994 Jul; 61(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 8089348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jul; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.