These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on 18F-FDG PET/CT: comparison with ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction incorporating time-of-flight model and point spread function correction. Kurita Y, Ichikawa Y, Nakanishi T, Tomita Y, Hasegawa D, Murashima S, Hirano T, Sakuma H. Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Miwa K, Wagatsuma K, Nemoto R, Masubuchi M, Kamitaka Y, Yamao T, Hiratsuka S, Yamaguchi M, Yoshii T, Kobayashi R, Miyaji N, Ishii K. Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [18 F]FDG and [11 C]PiB. Wagatsuma K, Miwa K, Kamitaka Y, Koike E, Yamao T, Yoshii T, Kobayashi R, Nezu S, Sugamata Y, Miyaji N, Imabayashi E, Ishibashi K, Toyohara J, Ishii K. Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for 90Y Selective Internal Radiotherapy on a Lutetium Yttrium Orthosilicate PET/CT System Using a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm. Rowley LM, Bradley KM, Boardman P, Hallam A, McGowan DR. J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ayati N, McIntosh L, Buteau J, Alipour R, Pudis M, Daw N, Jackson P, Hofman MS. Cancer Imaging; 2024 May 06; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm suppresses edge artifacts in PET reconstruction based on point-spread-function. Yamaguchi S, Wagatsuma K, Miwa K, Ishii K, Inoue K, Fukushi M. Phys Med; 2018 Mar 06; 47():73-79. PubMed ID: 29609821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights. Chilcott AK, Bradley KM, McGowan DR. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan 06; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters. Akamatsu G, Ishikawa K, Mitsumoto K, Taniguchi T, Ohya N, Baba S, Abe K, Sasaki M. J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov 06; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size. Otani T, Hosono M, Kanagaki M, Onishi Y, Matsubara N, Kawabata K, Kimura H. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug 06; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes of [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantitative parameters in tumor lesions by the Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm and its influencing factors. Liu Y, Gao MJ, Zhou J, Du F, Chen L, Huang ZK, Hu JB, Lou C. BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep 16; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm. Vennart NJ, Bird N, Buscombe J, Cheow HK, Nowosinska E, Heard S. Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun 16; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]