These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 38641478

  • 1. Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 18. PubMed ID: 38641478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy comparison of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator between an analog facebow record and a digital photography technique.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Strommer S, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 11. PubMed ID: 38609764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Kois JC.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Dec 11; 36(12):1675-1686. PubMed ID: 38778662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
    Revilla-León M, Agustín-Panadero R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov 11; 132(5):964-972. PubMed ID: 36682896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of the 3-dimensional virtual patient representation obtained by using 4 different techniques: An in vitro study.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun 11; 131(6):1178-1188. PubMed ID: 35773020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Barmak AB, Att W, Kois JC.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar 11; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. True horizontal or gravity plane registration for transferring the maxillary scan into the virtual articulator by using a facial scanner without the need for an additional device.
    Revilla-León M, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug 16. PubMed ID: 39153940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Analysis of the influence of the facial scanning method on the transfer accuracy of a maxillary digital scan to a 3D face scan for a virtual facebow technique: An in vitro study.
    Amezua X, Iturrate M, Garikano X, Solaberrieta E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov 16; 128(5):1024-1031. PubMed ID: 33722381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records.
    Li J, Chen Z, Decker AM, Wang HL, Joda T, Mendonca G, Lepidi L.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan 16; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of apical finish line location of tooth preparations on the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners with various focal lengths and scanning technologies.
    Revilla-León M, Fry E, Zeitler JM, Li J, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug 16. PubMed ID: 39153939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-based virtual mounting technique with that of the conventional mounting technique using a facebow.
    Kim SJ, Kang YJ, Kim JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov 11. PubMed ID: 37957064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Discrepancies of centric occlusion located by using a conventional method and four intraoral scanners combined with a computer-aided design program: A pilot investigation.
    Revilla-León M, Ntovas P, Barmak AB, Fernández-Estevan L, Agustín-Panadero R, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul 31. PubMed ID: 39089927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Yilmaz B, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul 31; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 18. PubMed ID: 38641480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Analysis of the impact of the facial scanning method on the precision of a virtual facebow record technique: An in vivo study.
    Amezua X, Iturrate M, Garikano X, Solaberrieta E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep 18; 130(3):382-391. PubMed ID: 34916065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, Barmak AB, Att W, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan 23. PubMed ID: 38267350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Impact of scanning distance on the accuracy of a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, Barmak AB, Guinot-Barona C, Att W, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J.
    J Dent; 2024 Mar 23; 142():104854. PubMed ID: 38246309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. True horizontal or gravity plane for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator by using an optical jaw tracking system.
    Revilla-León M, Kois JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May 06. PubMed ID: 38714458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis.
    Tian J, Jung RE, Han Y, Mei Y, Di P.
    J Dent; 2024 Nov 06; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Facial scanning accuracy depending on the alignment algorithm and digitized surface area location: An in vitro study.
    Revilla-León M, Pérez-Barquero JA, Barmak BA, Agustín-Panadero R, Fernández-Estevan L, Att W.
    J Dent; 2021 Jul 06; 110():103680. PubMed ID: 33901605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.