These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R. J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study. Anusha CV, Singh AA, Sam G, Sangwan B, Shilpa M, Kamath AG. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr 01; 17(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 27340168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program. Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 10. PubMed ID: 38604907 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study. Lin H, Pan Y, Wei X, Wang Y, Yu H, Cheng H. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul 10; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans. Inoue N, Scialabba R, Lee JD, Lee SJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan 10; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study. Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. J Dent; 2023 May 10; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. Revilla-León M, Young K, Sicilia E, Cho SH, Kois JC. J Dent; 2022 May 10; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro comparison of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with five facebow systems. Maveli TC, Suprono MS, Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Bahjri K. J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct 10; 114(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 26139043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions. Jelicich A, Scialabba R, Lee SJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb 10; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of a patient 3-dimensional virtual representation obtained from the superimposition of facial and intraoral scans guided by extraoral and intraoral scan body systems. Revilla-León M, Zandinejad A, Nair MK, Barmak AB, Feilzer AJ, Özcan M. J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov 10; 128(5):984-993. PubMed ID: 33838919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. Gómez-Polo M, Piedra-Cascón W, Methani MM, Quesada-Olmo N, Farjas-Abadia M, Revilla-León M. J Dent; 2021 Jul 10; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]