These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
153 related items for PubMed ID: 38641480
1. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns. Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 18. PubMed ID: 38641480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of apical finish line location of tooth preparations on the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners with various focal lengths and scanning technologies. Revilla-León M, Fry E, Zeitler JM, Li J, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug 16. PubMed ID: 39153939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners. Revilla-León M, Cascos-Sánchez R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Gómez-Polo M. J Dent; 2023 Mar 16; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Yilmaz B, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul 16; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study. Vag J, Stevens CD, Badahman MH, Ludlow M, Sharp M, Brenes C, Mennito A, Renne W. J Dent; 2023 Dec 16; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study. Revilla-León M, Agustín-Panadero R, Zeitler JM, Barmak AB, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov 16; 132(5):964-972. PubMed ID: 36682896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD, Barbosa TAQ, Moura GF, Tavares LDN, Rizzante FAP, George FM, Neves FDD, Mendonça G. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb 16; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study. Revilla-León M, Fernández-Estevan L, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Pérez-Barquero JA. J Dent; 2023 May 16; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans. de Andrade GS, Luz JN, Tribst JPM, Chun EP, Bressane A, Borges ALS, Saavedra GSFA. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun 16; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations. Gómez-Polo M, Immorlano MG, Cascos-Sánchez R, Ortega R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, Revilla-León M. J Dent; 2023 Oct 16; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]