These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


151 related items for PubMed ID: 3864972

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC, Garman TA, Pashley DH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vitro resistance of extensive amalgam restorations using various retention methods.
    Plasmans PJ, Kusters ST, de Jonge BA, van 't Hof MA, Vrijhoef MM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 3468247
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preparation modifications for damaged vital posterior teeth.
    Shillingburg HT, Jacobi R, Brackett SE.
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):305-26. PubMed ID: 3888700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reinforced matrices for pin-amalgam restorations reduce microleakage.
    Harrington WG, Moon PC, Crockett WD, Shepard FE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jun; 41(6):622-4. PubMed ID: 374719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Complex amalgam reconstruction. II].
    Pescarmona G, Fuzzi M.
    Dent Cadmos; 1985 Feb 28; 53(3):17, 19, 21-7 passim. PubMed ID: 3894070
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pin-retained base in conjunction with complex pin-and-amalgam restoration.
    Murray RR.
    Oper Dent; 1985 Feb 28; 10(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 3862079
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S, Yogesh BG.
    Oper Dent; 1990 Feb 28; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel.
    Abu-Hanna AA, Mjör IA.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Feb 28; 29(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 15088737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW, Burgess JO, Summitt JB.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr 28; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cross-splinting a weakened tooth with a horizontal pin: a new method.
    Mondelli J, Ishikiriama A, Pereira JC, Francischone CE, de Lima Navarro MF, Galan Júnior J, Cordazzi JL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Apr 28; 57(4):442-5. PubMed ID: 3471956
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A pin amalgam or composite core foundation technique for teeth with minimal coronal structure.
    Mamoun JS, Cervini E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun 28; 91(6):599-602. PubMed ID: 15211306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Extracoronal amalgam restorations utilizing available tooth structure for retention.
    Birtcil RF, Venton EA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Feb 28; 35(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 1061811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pins and their relation to cavity resistance form for amalgam.
    Buikema DJ, Mayhew RB, Voss JE, Bales DJ.
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Mar 28; 16(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 3857664
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ.
    Gen Dent; 2000 Mar 28; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.