These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up? Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Lachiewicz PF, Ryan SP, Wellman SS. Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners. Hoskins W, Griffin X, Hatton A, de Steiger RN, Bingham R. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan 01; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Late intraprosthetic dislocation of a monoblock dual-mobility cup cemented into a well-fixed cementless acetabular shell. A case report. Ulgelmo M, Sandri A, Regis D, Casablanca E, Toso G, Valentini R, Magnan B. Acta Biomed; 2022 Sep 21; 93(S1):e2022206. PubMed ID: 36129744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups. Assi C, Caton J, Fawaz W, Samaha C, Yammine K. Int Orthop; 2019 Oct 21; 43(10):2245-2251. PubMed ID: 30370452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence. Hernigou P, Tannyeres P, Barbier O, Chenaie P. Int Orthop; 2023 Aug 21; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan 21; 99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. PubMed ID: 28042114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual Mobility Versus Fixed Bearing Implants in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under 55 Years of Age. Arraut J, Oakley C, Shichman I, Hepinstall M, Macaulay W, Schwarzkopf R. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2024 Sep 21; 82(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 39150876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual Mobility Bearing Articulations Result in Lower Rates of Dislocation After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Li WT, Kozick Z, Sherman M, Restrepo C, Smith EB, Courtney PM. J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Oct 15; 28(20):831-837. PubMed ID: 31834038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Hamadouche M, Ropars M, Rodaix C, Musset T, Gaucher F, Biau D, Courpied JP, Huten D. Int Orthop; 2017 Mar 15; 41(3):513-519. PubMed ID: 27889840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pituckanotai K, Arirachakaran A, Tuchinda H, Putananon C, Nualsalee N, Setrkraising K, Kongtharvonskul J. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr 15; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]