These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 38761554

  • 1. Effects of hearing acuity on psychophysiological responses to effortful speech perception.
    Keur-Huizinga L, Huizinga NA, Zekveld AA, Versfeld NJ, van de Ven SRB, van Dijk WAJ, de Geus EJC, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109031. PubMed ID: 38761554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Wendt D, Naylor G, Wang Y, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
    Koelewijn T, van Haastrecht JAP, Kramer SE.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Sep; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H, Plain BJ, Saunders GH, Versfeld NJ, Lunner T, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Sep; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K, McMahon C, Boisvert I, Ibrahim R, de Lissa P, Graham P, Lyxell B.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Sep; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Sep; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Investigating the Influences of Task Demand and Reward on Cardiac Pre-Ejection Period Reactivity During a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Plain B, Richter M, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Bhuiyan T, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Sep; 42(3):718-731. PubMed ID: 33201048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
    Wang Y, Naylor G, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA, Wendt D, Ohlenforst B, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Sep; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task.
    Mackersie CL, Cones H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 21463566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Automated Measurement of Speech Recognition, Reaction Time, and Speech Rate and Their Relation to Self-Reported Listening Effort for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using various Maskers.
    Holube I, Taesler S, Ibelings S, Hansen M, Ooster J.
    Trends Hear; 2024 Feb; 28():23312165241276435. PubMed ID: 39311635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Social observation increases the cardiovascular response of hearing-impaired listeners during a speech reception task.
    Plain B, Pielage H, Richter M, Bhuiyan TA, Lunner T, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA.
    Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 410():108334. PubMed ID: 34450568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M, de Ronde-Brons I, Dreschler WA, Houben R.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Oct; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.