These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 38788930

  • 1. Neural responses to oral administration of erythritol vs. sucrose and sucralose explain differences in subjective liking ratings.
    Budzinska A, Teysseire F, Flad E, Dupont P, Wölnerhanssen B, Meyer-Gerspach AC, Van Oudenhove L, Weltens N.
    Appetite; 2024 Sep 01; 200():107422. PubMed ID: 38788930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Obesity and Sex-Related Associations With Differential Effects of Sucralose vs Sucrose on Appetite and Reward Processing: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Yunker AG, Alves JM, Luo S, Angelo B, DeFendis A, Pickering TA, Monterosso JR, Page KA.
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Sep 01; 4(9):e2126313. PubMed ID: 34581796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners.
    Fujimaru T, Park JH, Lim J.
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep 01; 77(9):S323-8. PubMed ID: 22908895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dietary sugars and non-caloric sweeteners elicit different homeostatic and hedonic responses in the brain.
    van Opstal AM, Kaal I, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Hoeksma M, Blonk C, Pijl H, Rombouts SARB, van der Grond J.
    Nutrition; 2019 Apr 01; 60():80-86. PubMed ID: 30529886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener.
    Frank GK, Oberndorfer TA, Simmons AN, Paulus MP, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Kaye WH.
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb 15; 39(4):1559-69. PubMed ID: 18096409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.
    Wee M, Tan V, Forde C.
    Nutrients; 2018 Nov 02; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30400167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).
    Tan VWK, Wee MSM, Tomic O, Forde CG.
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul 02; 121():39-47. PubMed ID: 31108762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K.
    Chem Senses; 2015 May 02; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Anandamide and sucralose change ΔFosB expression in the reward system.
    Salaya-Velazquez NF, López-Muciño LA, Mejía-Chávez S, Sánchez-Aparicio P, Domínguez-Guadarrama AA, Venebra-Muñoz A.
    Neuroreport; 2020 Feb 05; 31(3):240-244. PubMed ID: 31923023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. No detriment in taste response or expression in offspring of mice fed representative levels of sucrose or non-caloric sucralose while pregnant.
    Choo E, Dando R.
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb 01; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 29108962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Multiple Dimensions of Sweet Taste Perception Altered after Sleep Curtailment.
    Szczygiel EJ, Cho S, Tucker RM.
    Nutrients; 2019 Aug 27; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31461917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Brain activity and connectivity changes in response to nutritive natural sugars, non-nutritive natural sugar replacements and artificial sweeteners.
    Van Opstal AM, Hafkemeijer A, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Hoeksma M, Mulder TPJ, Pijl H, Rombouts SARB, van der Grond J.
    Nutr Neurosci; 2021 May 27; 24(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 31288630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners.
    Low JY, McBride RL, Lacy KE, Keast RS.
    Chem Senses; 2017 Feb 27; 42(2):111-120. PubMed ID: 27765786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A, Ackroff K.
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May 01; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Sucrose replacement in high ratio white layer cakes.
    Miller RA, Dann OE, Oakley AR, Angermayer ME, Brackebusch KH.
    J Sci Food Agric; 2017 Aug 01; 97(10):3228-3232. PubMed ID: 27925212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Oral Erythritol Reduces Energy Intake during a Subsequent ad libitum Test Meal: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial in Healthy Humans.
    Teysseire F, Flad E, Bordier V, Budzinska A, Weltens N, Rehfeld JF, Beglinger C, Van Oudenhove L, Wölnerhanssen BK, Meyer-Gerspach AC.
    Nutrients; 2022 Sep 21; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 36235571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.