These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 38795735

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial.
    Papastergiou V, Paraskeva KD, Fragaki M, Dimas I, Vardas E, Theodoropoulou A, Mathou N, Giannakopoulos A, Karmiris K, Mpitouli A, Apessou D, Giannikaki L, Karagiannis JA, Chlouverakis G, Paspatis GA.
    Endoscopy; 2018 Apr; 50(4):403-411. PubMed ID: 28898922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized trial.
    Horiuchi A, Makino T, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY.
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 27100717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
    Mangira D, Raftopoulos S, Vogrin S, Hartley I, Mack A, Gazelakis K, Nalankilli K, Trinh A, Metz AJ, Appleyard M, Grimpen F, Elliott T, Brown G, Moss A.
    Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
    Li D, Wang W, Xie J, Liu G, Wang R, Jiang C, Ye Z, Xu B, He X, Hong D.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: a prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesions.
    Pellise M, Burgess NG, Tutticci N, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, P'Ng H, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ.
    Gut; 2017 Apr; 66(4):644-653. PubMed ID: 26786685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.
    Komeda Y, Kashida H, Sakurai T, Tribonias G, Okamoto K, Kono M, Yamada M, Adachi T, Mine H, Nagai T, Asakuma Y, Hagiwara S, Matsui S, Watanabe T, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Chiba Y, Kudo M.
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan 14; 23(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 28127206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cold endoscopic mucosal resection versus cold snare polypectomy for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Arruda do Espirito Santo P, Meine GC, Baraldo S, Barbosa EC.
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jul 14; 56(7):503-511. PubMed ID: 38503302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6- to 15-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rex DK, Anderson JC, Pohl H, Lahr RE, Judd S, Antaki F, Lilley K, Castelluccio PF, Vemulapalli KC.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Aug 14; 96(2):330-338. PubMed ID: 35288147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cold versus hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for large (≥15 mm) flat non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomised controlled trial.
    O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, van Hattem WA, Mandarino FV, Gauci JL, Kerrison C, Whitfield A, Gupta S, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ.
    Gut; 2024 Oct 07; 73(11):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 38964854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kim MJ, Na SY, Kim JS, Choi HH, Kim DB, Ji JS, Kim BW, Choi H.
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May 07; 37(5):3789-3795. PubMed ID: 36690892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Oh CK, Cho YS, Lee SH, Lee BI.
    Endoscopy; 2023 Feb 07; 55(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 35750321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.