These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


148 related items for PubMed ID: 38796434

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
    Soares Tenório KC, Neupmann Feres MF, Tanaka CJ, Augusto MKM, Rodrigues JA, Pereira da Silva HD, Arana-Chavez VE, Roscoe MG.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Doddavarapu S, K B, Singaraju GS, Yamini Priyanka JS, Vivek Reddy G, Mandava P.
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
    Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, Makou M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe.
    Thawaba AA, Albelasy NF, Elsherbini AM, Hafez AM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov 01; 23(11):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 37073931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Enamel surface roughness evaluation after bracket debonding: Comparison between light cure and self cure adhesive resin 3-Dimensional profilometric study.
    Chandrasekharan D, Sourabh C, Deenadayalan, Praveen K.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2022 Nov 01; 33(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 35946250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S, Shafiee HA, Ameli N.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar 01; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct 01; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.