These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
184 related items for PubMed ID: 38809289
1. In-vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth restored with different high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative materials and bulk-fill composite resins. Nezir M, Ozcan S. Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May 29; 28(6):345. PubMed ID: 38809289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations. Taha NA, Maghaireh GA, Ghannam AS, Palamara JE. J Dent; 2017 Aug 29; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. Kielbassa AM, Oehme EP, Shakavets N, Wolgin M. J Dent; 2021 Feb 29; 105():103554. PubMed ID: 33309807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods. Mergulhão VA, de Mendonça LS, de Albuquerque MS, Braz R. Oper Dent; 2019 Feb 29; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study. Al-Nahedh HN. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr 01; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan 01; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of endodontically treated Teeth with Different Restorative Materials. Sangwan B, Rishi R, Seal M, Jain K, Dutt P, Talukdar P. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul 01; 17(7):549-52. PubMed ID: 27595720 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XJ, Yuan CY, Li JX, Chu CH. Int Endod J; 2012 Jun 01; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins. Akbarian G, Ameri H, Chasteen JE, Ghavamnasiri M. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014 Jun 01; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB. Am J Dent; 2002 Dec 01; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In Vitro evaluation of the bond strength of metal brackets adhered to different dental restorative materials using different orthodontic adhesives. Ozcan S, Nezir M, Topcuoglu E, Atilla AO, Yagci A. Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Apr 01; 26(4):447-453. PubMed ID: 37203109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]