These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. An Anatomorphometric Study of Occipital Spurs and Their Association With Dental Occlusion. Çağlayan F, Polat B, Tugluoglu Dalci HL, Oncu E, Kuzey N, Guller H. Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e51827. PubMed ID: 38327918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between cranial and facial classification through clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among Envigado school children. Torres-Restrepo AM, Quintero-Monsalve AM, Giraldo-Mira JF, Rueda ZV, Vélez-Trujillo N, Botero-Mariaca P. BMC Oral Health; 2014 May 07; 14():50. PubMed ID: 24886038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun 07; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Morphometric analysis of occipital condyles using alternative imaging technique. Gumussoy I, Duman SB. Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Feb 07; 42(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 31549198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tridimensional assessment of the mandibular angle in patients with different skeletal patterns by cone-beam computed tomography scans: a retrospective study. Miranda-Viana M, Moreira GM, de Souza LM, Nejaim Y, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ. BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun 04; 23(1):361. PubMed ID: 37271800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners. van Vlijmen OJ, Rangel FA, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Becking AG, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct 04; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms. Hariharan A, Diwakar NR, Jayanthi K, Hema HM, Deepukrishna S, Ghaste SR. Indian J Dent Res; 2016 Oct 04; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Occipital spurs on lateral cephalometric radiographs: morphologic and morphometric features. Gunacar DN, Gonca M, Kose TE. Oral Radiol; 2022 Jul 04; 38(3):416-421. PubMed ID: 34714510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Breed-Specific Skull Morphology Reveals Insights into Canine Optic Chiasm Positioning and Orbital Structure through 3D CT Scan Analysis. Ichikawa Y, Kanemaki N, Kanai K. Animals (Basel); 2024 Jan 07; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38254367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishment of Cephalic Index Using Cranial Parameters by Computed Tomography in a Sampled North Indian Population. Khanduri S, Malik S, Khan N, Patel YD, Khan A, Chawla H, Singh V, Gupta A, Shaikh J, Siddiqui S. Cureus; 2021 Jun 07; 13(6):e15421. PubMed ID: 34249567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]