These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 3887119

  • 21. Immunohistochemical comparison of indermil with traditional suture materials in dental surgery.
    Muglali M, Ylmaz N, Inal S, Guvenc T.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1875-9. PubMed ID: 21959453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Influence of surgical knots on physical characteristics of atraumatic sutures].
    Nardi P, Barone R, Borghini G.
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1989 Sep; 9(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 2701139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study.
    Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):559-565. PubMed ID: 29717362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.
    Muftuoglu MA, Ozkan E, Saglam A.
    Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Leroux N, Bujold E.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1585-90; discussion 1590. PubMed ID: 16731075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Thrombogenicity of different suture materials as revealed by scanning electron microscopy.
    Dahlke H, Dociu N, Thurau K.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 7364788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Choice of suture material for surgery on the biliary system].
    Muradaliev MA, Tumanov VP.
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1983 Dec; 96(12):105-7. PubMed ID: 6661535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Suture in oral surgery. A comparative study.
    Arcuri C, Cecchetti F, Dri M, Muzzi F, Bartuli FN.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006 Dec; 55(1-2):17-31. PubMed ID: 16495870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Novel Coating of Surgical Suture Confers Antimicrobial Activity Against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis.
    Meghil MM, Rueggeberg F, El-Awady A, Miles B, Tay F, Pashley D, Cutler CW.
    J Periodontol; 2015 Jun; 86(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 25703732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Use of absorbable suture material in dermatologic surgery].
    Breuninger H, Haueisen S.
    Z Hautkr; 1985 Mar 01; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3922138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.