These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 38880958

  • 1. Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: II. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Speech-Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Varghese J, Lefler SM, Bhat A, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Ear Hear; ; 45(6):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 38880958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improved Cochlear Implant Performance Estimation Using Tonotopic-Based Electrocochleography.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Varghese J, Ioerger P, Lefler SM, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Dec 01; 149(12):1120-1129. PubMed ID: 37856099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Panario J, Bester C, O'Leary S.
    Ear Hear; 2023 Dec 01; 45(5):1173-1190. PubMed ID: 38816899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.
    Canfarotta MW, O'Connell BP, Giardina CK, Buss E, Brown KD, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA, Adunka OF, Fitzpatrick DC.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Dec 01; 42(4):941-948. PubMed ID: 33369942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Valenzuela CV, Lichtenhan JT, Lefler SM, Koka K, Buchman CA, Ortmann AJ.
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Oct 01; 131(10):E2681-E2688. PubMed ID: 34019310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD, O'Connell BP.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Oct 01; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electrocochleography and cognition are important predictors of speech perception outcomes in noise for cochlear implant recipients.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Kallogjeri D, Wick CC, Durakovic N, Lefler SM, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb 23; 12(1):3083. PubMed ID: 35197556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
    Peters JPM, Bennink E, van Zanten GA.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019 Feb 23; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study.
    Dillon MT, Buss E, Johnson AD, Canfarotta MW, O'Connell BP.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023 Feb 23; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Factors Affecting Performance in Adults With Cochlear Implants: A Role for Cognition and Residual Cochlear Function.
    Walia A, Shew MA, Lefler SM, Ortmann AJ, Durakovic N, Wick CC, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Dec 01; 44(10):988-996. PubMed ID: 37733968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation.
    Ramos-Macias A, O'Leary S, Ramos-deMiguel A, Bester C, Falcon-González JC.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun 01; 40(5S Suppl 1):S29-S37. PubMed ID: 31225820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function.
    Panario J, Bester C, O'Leary SJ.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jun 01; 44(5):1088-1106. PubMed ID: 36935398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: I. Place Coding of the Human Cochlea With Hearing Loss.
    Walia A, Ortmann AJ, Lefler S, Holden TA, Puram SV, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Ear Hear; 2024 Sep 05. PubMed ID: 39233326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The smaller the frequency-to-place mismatch the better the hearing outcomes in cochlear implant recipients?
    Mertens G, Van de Heyning P, Vanderveken O, Topsakal V, Van Rompaey V.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Apr 05; 279(4):1875-1883. PubMed ID: 34131770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT, Gilbert M, Cooke D, Jiradejvong P, Barrett K, Caldwell M, Limb CJ.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb 01; 145(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30477013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Is Characteristic Frequency Limiting Real-Time Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation?
    Walia A, Shew MA, Lefler SM, Kallogjeri D, Wick CC, Holden TA, Durakovic N, Ortmann AJ, Herzog JA, Buchman CA.
    Front Neurosci; 2022 Feb 01; 16():915302. PubMed ID: 35937872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Correlation Between Cochlear Length, Insertion Angle, and Tonotopic Mismatch for MED-EL FLEX28 Electrode Arrays.
    Dutrieux N, Quatre R, Péan V, Schmerber S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan 01; 43(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 34538852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.