These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

332 related items for PubMed ID: 3888487

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
    Rooker D, Baalbergen A, Helmerhorst TJ.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr 26; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The significance of documenting clinical appearance of the uterine cervix in the cervical cytology form.
    Al-Kadri HM, Hajeer AH, Al-Hawashim NS, Salem HH.
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Nov 26; 27(11):1698-702. PubMed ID: 17106544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The false negative smear: an instrumental error?
    Rubio CA.
    Acta Cytol; 1977 Nov 26; 21(4):500-1. PubMed ID: 269598
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Reevaluation for overlooked signs of cervical smears in cases of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Kutsuzawa T, Yamada Y, Ishizaki Y, Sato C, Kaneko M, Moriya S, Ichinoe K.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Dec 26; 36(12):2598-604. PubMed ID: 6520480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. HPV presence precedes abnormal cytology in women developing cervical cancer and signals false negative smears.
    Zielinski GD, Snijders PJ, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, van der Linden HC, Runsink AP, de Schipper FA, Meijer CJ.
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Aug 03; 85(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 11487272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Comparison of monolayer specimens and conventional smears].
    Jensen ML, Fuursted PB, Svanholm H.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Feb 26; 163(9):1270-5. PubMed ID: 11258251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D, Dahl MB, Hølund B.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun 02; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Cytological tests for prevention of cervical cancer].
    Hanuszek K.
    Wiad Lek; 1979 Sep 15; 32(18):1319-22. PubMed ID: 506270
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies.
    Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JR.
    Acta Cytol; 1985 Sep 15; 29(6):1043-6. PubMed ID: 3866457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ, Chirenje ZM.
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep 15; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Cytological examination of a uterine cervix smear].
    Janssens J, Oosterhuis JW.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1979 Dec 01; 123(48):2064-6. PubMed ID: 390411
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Review of screening and preventive strategies for cervical cancer in India.
    Patro BK, Nongkynrih B.
    Indian J Public Health; 2007 Dec 01; 51(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 18232160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.