These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
196 related items for PubMed ID: 3890498
1. Non-specific rhinoreactivity: non-specific nasal provocation tests with methacholine and cold water solution. Filiaci F, Zambetti G, Di Filippo S, Mancini CM. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 1985; 13(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3890498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Aspecific nasal reactivity in allergic and non-allergic rhinopathy. Filiaci F, Zambetti G. Rhinology; 1983 Dec; 21(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 6665421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Behaviour and dynamics of nasal flow during the test. Olivé-Pérez A. Rhinology; 1992 Sep; 30(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 1448676 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of nasal histamine and allergen provocations in patients with allergic rhinitis]. Tahamiler R, Saritzali G, Canakçioğlu S. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2007 Sep; 17(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 17483609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Methacholine inhalation challenge. Practical consequences of using duplicate spirograms after each concentration. Prieto L, Marín J. Ann Allergy; 1993 Jun; 70(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 8507045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between airway sensitivity to adenosine 5' monophosphate and the shape of the concentration-response curve to methacholine in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Prieto L, Gutiérrez V, Marín J. Respir Med; 2001 Jun; 95(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 11421502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in airway resistance following nasal provocation. Littell NT, Carlisle CC, Millman RP, Braman SS. Am Rev Respir Dis; 1990 Mar; 141(3):580-3. PubMed ID: 2178523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The alteration of nasal resistance before and after local exposure to heated aerosol in perennial allergic rhinitis. Naito K, Miyata S, Baba R, Mamiya T, Senoh Y, Iwata S, Yokoyama N, Yamakawa S, Ibata K. Rhinology; 1999 Jun; 37(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 10416251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an intranasal house dust mite provocation model as a tool in clinical research. Oldenbeuving NB, KleinJan A, Mulder PG, Lumley P, de Groot EJ, van Drunen CM, Fokkens WJ. Allergy; 2005 Jun; 60(6):751-9. PubMed ID: 15876304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Thresholds in nasal histamine challenge in patients with allergic rhinitis, patients with hyperreflectory rhinopathy, and healthy volunteers. Wuestenberg EG, Hauswald B, Huettenbrink KB. Am J Rhinol; 2004 Jun; 18(6):371-5. PubMed ID: 15706984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Specific nasal provocative test in allergic rhinitis diagnosis: reliability and standardization]. Bellussi L, De Lauretis A, D'Onza M, Giannuzzi AL, Passali FM. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2002 Aug; 22(4):208-14. PubMed ID: 12379041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nasal reactivity to histamine and methacholine: two different forms of upper airway responsiveness. Gerth van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Rhinology; 1994 Sep; 32(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 7839080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]