These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 38911429

  • 1. Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Ropivacaine During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Study.
    Kaur K, Kaur T, Kapila S, Bhullar RS, Dhawan A, Singh B.
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2024 Jun; 23(3):538-544. PubMed ID: 38911429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the effects of articaine and bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar tooth surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Tokuç B, Coşkunses FM.
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Dec; 21(6):575-582. PubMed ID: 34909475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.
    Pellicer-Chover H, Cervera-Ballester J, Sanchis-Bielsa JM, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B.
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2013 Apr 01; 5(2):e66-71. PubMed ID: 24455059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Mittal J, Kaur G, Mann HS, Narang S, Kamra M, Kapoor S, Sindhi M, Kataria R.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun 01; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Adrenaline and 0.75% Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in the Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar.
    Deshpande N, Jadhav A, Bhola ND, Gupta M.
    Cureus; 2022 Sep 01; 14(9):e29639. PubMed ID: 36321015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Goyal R, Sharma P, Bali R.
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2021 Jun 01; 20(2):234-239. PubMed ID: 33927491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized anesthethic potency comparison between ropivacaine and bupivacaine on the perioperative regional anesthesia in lower third molar surgery.
    Tijanic M, Buric N.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct 01; 47(10):1652-1660. PubMed ID: 31395418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study.
    Jain NK, John RR.
    Anesth Essays Res; 2016 Oct 01; 10(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 27212774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of efficacy of lignocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in pain control during extraction of mandibular posterior teeth.
    Nazeer J, Kumari S, Haidry N, Kulkarni P, Aastha, Gautam A, Gupta P.
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct 01; 12(2):238-243. PubMed ID: 34483583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine.
    Trullenque-Eriksson A, Guisado-Moya B.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 May 01; 16(3):e390-6. PubMed ID: 21196829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Yang F, Gao Y, Zhang L, Zheng B, Wang L, Sun H, Huang D.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov 01; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: prospective, randomized crossover study.
    Thakare A, Bhate K, Kathariya R.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2014 Jun 01; 52(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 25016509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, ropivacaine (with epinephrine) and their equal volume mixtures with lidocaine used for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks: a double-blind randomized study.
    Cuvillon P, Nouvellon E, Ripart J, Boyer JC, Dehour L, Mahamat A, L'hermite J, Boisson C, Vialles N, Lefrant JY, de La Coussaye JE.
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb 01; 108(2):641-9. PubMed ID: 19151302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine for Surgical Removal of Third Molar by Mandibular Nerve Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial for Efficacy and Safety.
    Saralaya S, Adirajaiah SB, Anehosur V.
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Sep 01; 18(3):405-411. PubMed ID: 31371883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Evaluation of anesthetic effect of ropivacaine in surgery of chronic periapical lessions].
    Tijanić M, Burić N, Jovanović G.
    Med Pregl; 2010 Sep 01; 63(5-6):366-70. PubMed ID: 21186548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
    Sierra Rebolledo A, Delgado Molina E, Berini Aytís L, Gay Escoda C.
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar 01; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Can local anesthesia with ropivacaine provide postoperative analgesia in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars? A randomized clinical trial.
    Amorim KS, Gercina AC, Ramiro FMS, Medeiros LA, de Araújo JSM, Groppo FC, Souza LMA.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 May 01; 131(5):512-518. PubMed ID: 33223455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of clinical efficacy of ropivacaine and lignocaine with adrenaline for implant surgery anesthesia: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Kalath RN, Kulal R, Gopinath S.
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Aug 01; 21(4):337-344. PubMed ID: 34395901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.
    Shyamala M, Ramesh C, Yuvaraj V, Suresh V, SathyaNarayanan R, Balaji TS, Neil Dominic M, Nithin Joseph Jude B.
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Mar 01; 15(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 26929560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.
    Gregorio LV, Giglio FP, Sakai VT, Modena KC, Colombini BL, Calvo AM, Sipert CR, Dionísio TJ, Lauris JR, Faria FA, Trindade Junior AS, Santos CF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul 01; 106(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 18420431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.