These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 3892746

  • 1. Which cephalosporin for wound prophylaxis? An experimental comparison of three drugs.
    Scher KS, Jones CW.
    Surgery; 1985 Jul; 98(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 3892746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Anaerobic coverage for wound prophylaxis. Comparison of cefazolin and cefoxitin.
    Sarap MD, Scher KS, Jones CW.
    Am J Surg; 1986 Feb; 151(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 3511760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of topical and systemic cefazolin for wound prophylaxis.
    Scher KS, Jones CW, Wroczynski AF.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Feb; 158(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 6364425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Failure of cephalosporins to prevent Staphylococcus aureus surgical wound infections.
    Kernodle DS, Classen DC, Burke JP, Kaiser AB.
    JAMA; 1990 Feb 16; 263(7):961-6. PubMed ID: 2299764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of cefamandole and cefazolin during cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Bryan CS, Smith CW, Sutton JP, Allen WB, Blanding R, Gangemi JD.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Aug 16; 86(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 6348425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of cefazolin microspheres to treat localized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in rats.
    Fallon MT, Shafer W, Jacob E.
    J Surg Res; 1999 Sep 16; 86(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 10452874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cefamandole versus cefazolin in vascular surgical wound infection prophylaxis: cost-effectiveness and risk factors.
    Edwards WH, Kaiser AB, Tapper S, Edwards WH, Martin RS, Mulherin JL, Jenkins JM, Roach AC.
    J Vasc Surg; 1993 Sep 16; 18(3):470-5; discussion 475-6. PubMed ID: 8377241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Absorbable, delayed-release antibiotic beads reduce surgical wound infection.
    Galandiuk S, Wrightson WR, Young S, Myers S, Polk HC.
    Am Surg; 1997 Sep 16; 63(9):831-5. PubMed ID: 9290532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Antibiotic prophylaxis in open-heart surgery: a comparison of cefamandole, cefuroxime, and cefazolin.
    Gentry LO, Zeluff BJ, Cooley DA.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1988 Aug 16; 46(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 3401076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A prospective, randomized, double blind study of preventive cefamandole therapy in patients at high risk for undergoing cholecystectomy.
    Crenshaw CA, Glanges E, Webber CE, McReynolds DB.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct 16; 153(4):546-52. PubMed ID: 7025307
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cefotaxime in the treatment of prophylaxis of surgical infections.
    Wittmann DH, Jones RN, Malledant J, Privitera G.
    J Chemother; 1997 May 16; 9 Suppl 2():19-33. PubMed ID: 9248973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vascular graft infection by Staphylococcus aureus: efficacy of cefazolin, teicoplanin and vancomycin prophylaxis protocols in a rat model.
    Atahan E, Gul M, Ergun Y, Eroglu E.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Aug 16; 34(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 17481929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.