These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [Evaluation of the API 20 C system for the rapid identification of yeast-like organisms]. Casal M, Linares MJ. Rev Latinoam Microbiol; 1984; 26(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 6385177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Pros and cons on the automated system for clinical microbiology]. Nakagomi O, Tobita M, Uesugi S. Rinsho Byori; 1988 Jul; 36(7):802-7. PubMed ID: 3070083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates--a promising tool in microbiology. Manafi M, Kneifel W. Acta Microbiol Hung; 1991 Jul; 38(3-4):293-304. PubMed ID: 1817426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli. O'Hara CM. J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical laboratory evaluation of an Automated Microbial Detection and Identification System (AMS) (author's transl)]. Kayser FH, Kolar I. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1979 Oct; 245(1-2):222-8. PubMed ID: 44615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The systems approach to diagnostic microbiology. D'Amato RF, Holmes B, Bottone EJ. Crit Rev Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 9(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 7028398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the microbiology laboratory in an era of increasing antibiotic resistance. Thomson KS. Postgrad Med; 2001 Feb; 109(2 Suppl):78-81. PubMed ID: 19667561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]