These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 3893872
41. Ribosomal DNA sequencing: experiences from use in the Danish National Reference Laboratory for Identification of Bacteria. Christensen JJ, Andresen K, Justesen T, Kemp M. APMIS; 2005 Sep; 113(9):621-8. PubMed ID: 16218938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Microbial spectrum in surgical infections based on a microbiological routine monitoring over the 10-year period from 1995 to 2004]. Mroczkowski P, Lauf H, Lippert H, König W, Meyer F. Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Jun; 134(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 19536716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. An evaluation of the New Roche Diagnostics Kit for the rapid identification of clinically important non-dextrose, non-fastidious gram-negative rods. Elegbe IA. Afr J Med Med Sci; 1980 Jun; 9(3-4):159-62. PubMed ID: 6283862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical Microbiology Is Growing Up: The Total Laboratory Automation Revolution. Bailey AL, Ledeboer N, Burnham CD. Clin Chem; 2019 May; 65(5):634-643. PubMed ID: 30518664 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparative evaluation of a new centrifugal air sampler (RCS) with a slit air sampler (SAS) in a hospital environment. Nakhla LS, Cummings RF. J Hosp Infect; 1981 Sep; 2(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 6174596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Evaluation of the operation of the automated microbiological system MS-2 from the company "Abbott Laboratories" (USA) in a clinical microbiological laboratory]. Gladshteĭn AI, Petrakov AA, Mel'nikova VM, Arutcheva AA. Vopr Med Khim; 1991 Sep; 37(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 1897205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparative costs of microbial identification employing conventional and prepackaged commercial systems. Bartlett RC, Kohan TS, Rutz C. Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Feb; 71(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 371383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [Luminescent cytochemical methods of detecting microorganisms]. Ivanovskaia NP, Osin NS, Khramov EN, Zlobin VN. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 1999 Feb; (8):33-8. PubMed ID: 10487121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Computer aided identification of eugonic gram-negative bacilli: clustering for bacteriological screening. Grenander U, Porres JM. Comput Biol Med; 1976 Apr; 6(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 773596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Total Laboratory Automation: What Is Gained, What Is Lost, and Who Can Afford It? Thomson RB, McElvania E. Clin Lab Med; 2019 Sep; 39(3):371-389. PubMed ID: 31383263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Turbidimetric microbiological assay results calculated by a BASIC computer program. Anderson EM. J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1989 Sep; 72(6):950-2. PubMed ID: 2687226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Quality control in microbiology: a review and bibliography. Braunstein H. Clin Lab Med; 1986 Dec; 6(4):649-74. PubMed ID: 3539478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Taxonomic update on proposed nomenclature and classification changes for bacteria of medical importance, 2013-2014. Janda JM. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Sep; 83(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 26014276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The way forward for fast microbiology. Mulatero F, Bonnardel V, Micolaud C. Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 May; 17(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 21521410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Some cautionary considerations for the automation of clinical microbiologic procedures. Isenberg HD. Mt Sinai J Med; 1977 May; 44(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 300462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Provision of a microbiological device evaluation service. Perry KR. Commun Dis Public Health; 2004 Mar; 7(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 15137289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]