These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 38947728

  • 1. Factors Associated With Failure of Synthesis in the Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures With Cephalomedullary Nails.
    Longo LH, Zimmermann Faggion H, Costa Sartor M, Senna Klipp MU, Vogt PH, Navarro Vergara AD, Valenza WR.
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e61363. PubMed ID: 38947728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?
    Caruso G, Bonomo M, Valpiani G, Salvatori G, Gildone A, Lorusso V, Massari L.
    Bone Joint Res; 2017 Aug; 6(8):481-488. PubMed ID: 28790037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.
    Caruso G, Corradi N, Caldaria A, Bottin D, Lo Re D, Lorusso V, Morotti C, Valpiani G, Massari L.
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan 10; 12(1):357. PubMed ID: 35013492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Calcar fracture gapping: a reliable predictor of anteromedial cortical support failure after cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric femur fractures.
    Song H, Chang SM, Hu SJ, Du SC, Xiong WF.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Feb 24; 23(1):175. PubMed ID: 35209887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.
    Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk PR.
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Aug 24; 96-B(8):1029-34. PubMed ID: 25086117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for cut-out in 398 femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in a private practice with dynamic intramedullary nailing.
    Barra AE, Barrios C.
    Front Surg; 2024 Aug 24; 11():1438858. PubMed ID: 39205795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Correlation between cephalic screw positioning of Standard Gamma 3 Nail for intertrochanteric fractures and cut-out incidence.
    Ortolani A, Lana D, Martucci A, Pesce F, Stallone S, Milani L, Urso R, Melucci G, Tigani D.
    SICOT J; 2024 Aug 24; 10():9. PubMed ID: 38415767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?
    Ibrahim I, Appleton PT, Wixted JJ, DeAngelis JP, Rodriguez EK.
    Injury; 2019 Apr 24; 50(4):926-930. PubMed ID: 30885393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.
    Caruso G, Andreotti M, Pari C, Soldati F, Gildone A, Lorusso V, Massari L.
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2017 Apr 24; 8(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 28360501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.