These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

439 related items for PubMed ID: 3898441

  • 1. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR, Mukherjee DP, Kaganov AL, Gordon S.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture.
    Ray JA, Doddi N, Regula D, Williams JA, Melveger A.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W, Hastings JC, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures.
    Ross G, Pavlides C, Long F, Kusaba A, Perlman M, Matsumoto T.
    Am Surg; 1981 Dec; 47(12):541-7. PubMed ID: 6274234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT, Beltran KA, Green CW, Faulkner BC, Stiles BM, Stanimir GW, Traeland H, Fried GM, Brown HC, Edlich RF.
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996 Dec; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the bladder.
    Hastings JC, Van Winkle W, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jun; 140(6):933-7. PubMed ID: 1129685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic absorbable suture for ophthalmic surgery.
    Dunlap WA, Purnell WD, McPherson SD.
    Adv Ophthalmol; 1976 Jun; 33():49-61. PubMed ID: 790910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vascular anastomoses with absorbable suture material: an experimental study.
    Schmitz-Rixen T, Storck M, Erasmi H, Schmiegelow P, Horsch S.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1991 May; 5(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 2064920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G, Schonauer F, Bifulco G, D'Angelo D.
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK, Vela AR, O'Leary JP.
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Tendon sutures with a new monofilament synthetic absorbable suture material (PDS-suture of 6-0 strength). Results of animal experiments].
    Albers W, Geldmacher J, Giedl H, Beyer W.
    Chirurg; 1982 Mar; 53(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 6802585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Studies on the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture.
    Lerwick E.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Jan; 156(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 6401197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA, Chegini N, Masterson BJ.
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Absorbable polydioxanone monofilament in the surgery of the anterior segment of the eye].
    Desbordes JM, Hamard H, Pouliquen Y.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1983 Jan; 6(12):1007-10. PubMed ID: 6425394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A biologic comparison of polyglactin 910 and polyglycolic acid synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Craig PH, Williams JA, Davis KW, Magoun AD, Levy AJ, Bogdansky S, Jones JP.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jul; 141(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1154207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The evaluation of 7-0 Polyglactin 910 suture in cataract surgery.
    Blaydes JE.
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1975 Jul; 6(4):99-104. PubMed ID: 1107925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB, Bitar H, Andreae PR, Martin LM, Finlay JB, Marquis F.
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC, Kizil Z.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.