These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 39011818
1. Comparison of chairside rectangular chain retainers and multi-stranded conventional retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Waldenström S, Qaljaee J, Bresin A, Esmaili S, Westerlund A. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug 01; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Jowett AC, Littlewood SJ, Hodge TM, Dhaliwal HK, Wu J. J Orthod; 2023 Mar 01; 50(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 36062600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between round multi-strand wire and rectangular wire bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Al-Maaitah EF, Alomari S, Al-Nimri K. Dental Press J Orthod; 2023 Mar 01; 28(2):e2321101. PubMed ID: 37222337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Tran G, Rucker R, Foley P, Bankhead B, Adel SM, Kim KB. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan 01; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38168815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 2: periodontal health and microbial biofilm assessment. Jasim ES, Kadhum AS. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct 01; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39312715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial. Steegmans PAJ, Cavagnetto D, Reynders RAM. Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec 01; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 1. Stability, retainer failure, and participant satisfaction. Jasim ES, Kadhum AS. Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct 01; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39206494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul 27; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers. Eroglu AK, Baka ZM, Arslan U. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug 27; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Post-treatment stability after 5 years of retention with vacuum-formed and bonded retainers-a randomized controlled trial. Krämer A, Sjöström M, Apelthun C, Hallman M, Feldmann I. Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb 10; 45(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 35968668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment. Krämer A, Sjöström M, Hallman M, Feldmann I. Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr 03; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 2: periodontal health outcomes after 12 months. Storey M, Forde K, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul 27; 40(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 29059293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]