These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 39011819

  • 1. Friction versus frictionless mechanics during maxillary en-masse retraction in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a randomized clinical trial.
    Magdi S, Abdelsayed FA, Aboulfotouh MH, Fahim FH.
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug 01; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of anchorage loss after en masse retraction in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: randomized clinical trial.
    Attia AM, Shibl LA, Dehis HM, Mostafa YA, El-Beialy AR.
    Angle Orthod; 2024 Sep 01; 94(5):532-540. PubMed ID: 39230024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the rate of anterior segment retraction in orthodontic patients with bimaxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: a single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Tawfik MGY, Izzat Bakhit DMHD, El Sharaby FA, Moustafa YA, Dehis HM.
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov 01; 92(6):738-745. PubMed ID: 35969196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Monga N, Kharbanda OP, Samrit V.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug 01; 150(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 27476360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Rate and anchorage loss during en-masse retraction between friction and frictionless mechanics: A randomized clinical trial.
    Sardana R, Chugh VK, Bhatia NK, Shastri D, Moungkhom P, Kumar P, Chugh A, Singh S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov 01; 26(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 36919990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun 01; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jan 01; 20(1):113-127. PubMed ID: 31058623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec 01; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM, Zhang X, Oh HS, Boyd RL, Korn EL, Baumrind S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov 01; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O, Youssef N, Mahaini L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec 01; 158(6):e111-e120. PubMed ID: 33158633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH, Yao CC, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov 01; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC, Lai EH, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov 01; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of low-level laser therapy on en masse retraction in females with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion : A single-center randomized clinical trial.
    Dehis HM, El Sharaby FA, Eid FH, Mostafa YA.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Jun 06. PubMed ID: 38842738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Efficiency of piezosurgery technique in miniscrew supported en-masse retraction: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Tunçer NI, Arman-Özçirpici A, Oduncuoglu BF, Göçmen JS, Kantarci A.
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Nov 30; 39(6):586-594. PubMed ID: 28402521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Patil S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul 30; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. En masse retraction of anterior teeth through rapid periodontal distraction by a retraction screw: A randomized control trial.
    Dora H, Shaikh MA, Gupta S, Maqhbool SB, Shamsuddin S, Kokate SR.
    J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Jun 30; 13(3):113-122. PubMed ID: 38508997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and intermaxillary elastics in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Koyama I, Iino S, Abe Y, Takano-Yamamoto T, Miyawaki S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr 30; 33(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 21059875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A, Júnior LG, Martins RP, Vianna AP.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep 30; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.
    Samrit V, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Seith A, Malhotra V.
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov 30; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul 30; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.