These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 39042340

  • 1. Oocyte donors' experience and expectations in a non-profit fertility care setting.
    Li Piani L, Tshilembi A, De Vos M, Buyse E, Ruttens S, Somigliana E, Tournaye H, Blockeel C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Sep; 41(9):2337-2347. PubMed ID: 39042340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
    Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Suikkari AM, Söderström-Anttila V.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr 01; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
    Jordan CB, Belar CD, Williams RS.
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun 01; 25(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 15715037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries.
    Pennings G, de Mouzon J, Shenfield F, Ferraretti AP, Mardesic T, Ruiz A, Goossens V.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May 01; 29(5):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24626802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
    Söderström-Anttila V, Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Poranen AK, Sälevaara M, Suikkari AM.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar 01; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun 01; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
    Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep 01; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation.
    Cordier C, Ducrocq B, Fry J, Catteau-Jonard S.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jun 01; 40(6):819-826. PubMed ID: 32295744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center.
    Blakemore JK, Voigt P, Schiffman MR, Lee S, Besser AG, Fino ME.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Oct 01; 36(10):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 31300913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.
    Kenney NJ, McGowan ML.
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb 01; 93(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 19022427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Stakeholders views on the ethical aspects of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a qualitative interview study with donors, recipients and professionals.
    Kool EM, van der Graaf R, Bos AME, Pieters JJPM, Custers IM, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 May 01; 34(5):842-850. PubMed ID: 30927419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A survey of anonymous oocyte donors: demographics.
    Kan AK, Abdalla HI, Ogunyemi BO, Korea L, Latarche E.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct 01; 13(1O):2762-6. PubMed ID: 9804227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. "They were my eggs; they were her babies": known oocyte donors' conceptualizations of their reproductive material.
    Blyth E, Yee S, Tsang AK.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Nov 01; 33(11):1134-40. PubMed ID: 22082787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G, Janson PO, Tägnfors U, Bergh C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar 01; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [How is the Czech oocyte donor? The analysis of their profile].
    Rumpíková T, Oborná I, Bělašková S, Rumpík D.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017 Mar 01; 82(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29020785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Exploring motivations, attitudes and experiences of oocyte donors: A qualitative study.
    Borgstrøm MB, Nygaard SS, Danielsen AK, Kesmodel US.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug 01; 98(8):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 30779111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Rethinking gamete donor care: A satisfaction survey of egg and sperm donors in the UK.
    Williams RA, Machin LL.
    PLoS One; 2018 Aug 01; 13(7):e0199971. PubMed ID: 30036373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation.
    Laruelle C, Place I, Demeestere I, Englert Y, Delbaere A.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb 01; 26(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 21149319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review.
    Platts S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones B, Parikh R, Thum MY.
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul 01; 24(3):169-181. PubMed ID: 30982353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Perspectives on sperm donor anonymity: insights from donor-conceived adults in Belgium.
    Casteels P, Nekkebroeck J, Tournaye H.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Sep 01; 39(9):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 39008824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.