These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
169 related items for PubMed ID: 3904462
1. Limitations of autocorrelation in fetal heart rate monitoring. Fukushima T, Flores CA, Hon EH, Davidson EC. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov 15; 153(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 3904462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The indirectly obtained fetal heart rate: comparison of first- and second-generation electronic fetal monitors. Boehm FH, Fields LM, Hutchison JM, Bowen AW, Vaughn WK. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul 15; 155(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 3524232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Studies on the cardiotocograms recorded by a new system with 1 MHz ultrasound and autocorrelation heart rate meter]. Sawazumi K, Nagata N, Irie T, Maeda K. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 May 15; 40(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 3290362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Results and experiences with an autocorrelating ultrasonic cardiotocograph]. Rüttgers H, Auer L. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1983 May 15; 187(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 6683443 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of signal loss on the comparison between computer analyses of the fetal heart rate in labour using pulsed Doppler ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and simultaneous scalp electrocardiogram. Spencer JA, Belcher R, Dawes GS. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 May 15; 25(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3297840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of ultrasound as compared to direct fetal electrocardiography for antepartum cardiotocography. Keirse MJ, Trimbos JB, Mallens TE, van der Heemst M. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr 15; 88(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 7225297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]