These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A randomized controlled trial of non-stress antepartum cardiotocography. Flynn AM, Kelly J, Mansfield H, Needham P, O'Conor M, Viegas O. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jun; 89(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 7044407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high-risk pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Brown VA, Sawers RS, Parsons RJ, Duncan SL, Cooke ID. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(9):716-22. PubMed ID: 7052117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of weekly cardiotocography in high-risk obstetric patients. Lumley J, Lester A, Anderson I, Renou P, Wood C. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Nov; 90(11):1018-26. PubMed ID: 6357270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement. Daly N, Brennan D, Foley M, O'Herlihy C. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21899943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of fetal wellbeing by antepartum fetal heart monitoring. Flynn AM, Kelly J. Br Med J; 1977 Apr 09; 1(6066):936-9. PubMed ID: 851791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical experience in non-stressed antepartum cardiotocography in high-risk pregnancies. Varma TR. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1981 Dec 09; 19(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 6121724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal size and growth velocity in the prediction of intrapartum caesarean section for fetal distress. Owen P, Harrold AJ, Farrell T. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Apr 09; 104(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 9141581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part III)]. Markwitz W, Ropacka M. Ginekol Pol; 2008 Mar 09; 79(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 18592859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Avoiding common mistakes in FHR monitoring. (Part II)]. Markwitz W, Ropacka M. Ginekol Pol; 2008 Feb 09; 79(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 18510096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby's condition at birth. Curzen P, Bekir JS, McLintock DG, Patel M. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov 17; 289(6455):1345-7. PubMed ID: 6437542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Westgren M, Ingemarsson E, Ingemarsson I, Solum T. Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep 17; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study. Kessler J, Moster D, Albrechtsen S. BJOG; 2015 Mar 17; 122(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 25040705 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. Pinas A, Chandraharan E. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan 17; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cardiotocography admission monitoring and intermittent intrapartum monitoring for fetal distress in labour]. Yan P. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Apr 17; 28(4):217-9, 253. PubMed ID: 8404305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study. Herbst A, Ingemarsson I. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug 17; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]