These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 3908747

  • 1. [Automation in clinical microbiology].
    Yamane N.
    Rinsho Byori; 1985 Aug; 33(8):875-83. PubMed ID: 3908747
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automated methods and data handling in bacteriology.
    Isenberg HD, MacLowry JD.
    Annu Rev Microbiol; 1976 Aug; 30():483-505. PubMed ID: 791076
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A review of automation and rapid methods in microbiology.
    Newsom SW.
    Med Lab Sci; 1978 Jul; 35(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 359990
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A semi-automated method for the culture, identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria direct from urine specimens.
    Henrichsen C, Moyes A.
    Med Lab Sci; 1987 Jan; 44(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 3309532
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Automation technics in microbial titrations].
    Tolle A, Heeschen W, Reichmuth J, Wernery H.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1972 May; 220(1):162-73. PubMed ID: 4145562
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Determining levels of bacteria present in urine by means of a gauged loop (author's transl)].
    Vitali C, Ripa S, Fortunato G.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Sep; 15(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 400186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Pros and cons on the automated system for clinical microbiology].
    Nakagomi O, Tobita M, Uesugi S.
    Rinsho Byori; 1988 Jul; 36(7):802-7. PubMed ID: 3070083
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Automated methods in microbiology: II. Identification and susceptibility testing.
    Malloy PJ, Miceika BG, Ducate MJ.
    Am J Med Technol; 1983 May; 49(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 6349352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Various aspects of automation in the field of microbiology].
    Hedén CG.
    Bol Oficina Sanit Panam; 1976 Oct; 81(4):313-25. PubMed ID: 134740
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pilot studies with an apparatus for automatic bacteriological testing of water.
    Kvittingen J.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 Dec; 179(6):596-604. PubMed ID: 6397938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An evaluation of the Replireader in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urine and in the recording of sensitivity tests performed by an agar dilution method.
    Waterworth PM.
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jun; 33(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 6995495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Semi-mechanized technique for subculturing blood.
    Singh L.
    Am J Med Technol; 1973 May; 39(5):187-90. PubMed ID: 4121783
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
    Suzuki K, Higuchi T.
    Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.