These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
118 related items for PubMed ID: 39087741
1. Suture closure AFtEr large bore vein access (SAFE-VEIN): A randomized, prospective study of the efficacy and safety of venous closure device. Ali M, Masood F, Erickson L, Adefisoye J, Kanani J, Walczak S, Ajam T, Kieu A, Premjee M, Jan MF, Allaqaband SQ, Bajwa T, Khitha J, Zilinski J, Jahangir A, Djelmami-Hani M, Sra J, Niazi I, Mortada ME. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Oct; 104(4):820-828. PubMed ID: 39087741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device. Klein-Wiele O, Baliota M, Kara K, Käunicke M, Schäfer H, Garbrecht M, Abdulghafor M, Garmer M, Hailer B. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb 15; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and safety of post-closure technique using Perclose ProGlide/ProStyle device for large-bore mechanical circulatory support access sites. Unoki T, Konami Y, Nakayama T, Suzuyama H, Horio E, Taguchi E, Saku K, Sawamura T, Nakao K, Sakamoto T. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 May 15; 62():60-65. PubMed ID: 38184452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Figure-of-Eight Suture and Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure in Large Bore Venous Access Hemostasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Lodhi H, Shaukat S, Mathews A, Maini B, Khalili H. Am J Cardiol; 2023 Dec 15; 209():181-183. PubMed ID: 37863115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Single suture-mediated closure system after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A single-center real-world experience. Iacovelli F, Burattini O, Sturdà F, Branca M, Stabile E, Fimiani L, Salemme L, Cioppa A, Pucciarelli A, Cafaro A, Bortone AS, Contegiacomo G, Pignatelli A, Tesorio T. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jun 15; 103(7):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 38639140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The CLOSER trial: a multi-center study on the clinical safety and effectiveness of CloserTM VSS, a novel resorbable transfemoral vascular access sealing system. Wong SC, Gammon R, Bachinsky W, O'Shaughnessy C, Leimbach W, Bernardo N, Cavros N, Jaff MR, Liu PY, Bergman G. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov 01; 90(5):798-805. PubMed ID: 28833996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Torque device suture technique to achieve hemostasis in large-bore venous access. Karahalios B, Rojas SF, Singh R, Cavazos MC, Chinnadurai P, Huie Lin C. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar 01; 95(4):722-725. PubMed ID: 31854083 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and Effectiveness of Suture-mediated Arterial Closure Device in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Underwent Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization. De Fina B, Nasser F, Cavalcante RN, Campos CA, Galastri FL, Affonso BB, Wolosker N, Perin MA. Ann Vasc Surg; 2019 Feb 01; 55():203-209. PubMed ID: 30217703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial). Wong SC, Bachinsky W, Cambier P, Stoler R, Aji J, Rogers JH, Hermiller J, Nair R, Hutman H, Wang H, ECLIPSE Trial Investigators. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug 01; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sheath Size Up and Down With Single Proglide - A Technique for Achieving Hemostasis With Use of Large Size Delivery System During Endovascular Graft Placement. Singh G, Scalise F, Bianchi P, Cireni L, Sorropago G, Casana R, Tolva V. Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan 01; 78():190-196. PubMed ID: 34464729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The utilization of single versus double Perclose devices for transfemoral aortic valve replacement access site closure: Insights from Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center. Bazarbashi N, Ahuja K, Gad MM, Sammour YM, Kaur M, Karrthik A, Saad AM, Khubber S, Dhaliwal K, Mick SL, Navia JL, Puri R, Reed GW, Krishnaswamy A, Kapadia SR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug 01; 96(2):442-447. PubMed ID: 31713996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized comparison of modified subcutaneous "Z"-stitch versus manual compression to achieve hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal. Pracon R, Bangalore S, Henzel J, Cendrowska-Demkow I, Pregowska-Chwala B, Tarnowska A, Dzielinska Z, Chmielak Z, Witkowski A, Demkow M. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan 01; 91(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 28303670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative data of single versus double proglide vascular preclose technique after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation from the optimized catheter valvular intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) japanese multicenter registry. Kodama A, Yamamoto M, Shimura T, Kagase A, Koyama Y, Tada N, Takagi K, Araki M, Yamanaka F, Shirai S, Watanabe Y, Hayashida K. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep 01; 90(3):E55-E62. PubMed ID: 27785881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]