These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 39123157

  • 1. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the detection of peri-implant fenestration.
    Gholampour A, Mollaei M, Ehsani H, Ghobadi F, Hosseinnataj A, Yazdani M.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug 09; 24(1):922. PubMed ID: 39123157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS, Gaweesh YSE, Taalab MR, El Sadat SA.
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec 17; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB, Wanderley VA, Câmara JVF, Santos LA, Ferrari CR, Araujo TT, Chilvarquer I.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Aug 17; 138(2):316-323. PubMed ID: 38493025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Efficacy of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Fenestration and Dehiscence around Dental Implants.
    Salemi F, Jamalpour MR, Eskandarloo A, Tapak L, Rahimi N.
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2021 Jun 17; 11(3):305-314. PubMed ID: 34189119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
    Dave M, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer R.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun 17; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems and Periapical Radiography for Detection of Fenestration Around Dental Implants.
    Eskandarloo A, Saati S, Ardakani MP, Jamalpour M, Gholi Mezerji NM, Akheshteh V.
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Jun 17; 9(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 30166830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L, Elger MC, Rothamel D, Fienitz T, Zinser M, Schwarz F, Zöller JE.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014 Jun 17; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
    Peterson AG, Wang M, Gonzalez S, Covell DA, Katancik J, Sehgal HS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018 Jun 17; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T, Juerchott A, Deisenhofer UK, Krisam J, Rammelsberg P, Heiland S, Bendszus M, Schwindling FS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep 17; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the different voxel sizes in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study.
    Kurt MH, Bağış N, Evli C, Atakan C, Orhan K.
    Int J Implant Dent; 2020 Oct 02; 6(1):58. PubMed ID: 33006000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M, Yeung AWK, Suter VGA, Buser D, Leung YY, Bornstein MM.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul 02; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
    Domic D, Bertl K, Ahmad S, Schropp L, Hellén-Halme K, Stavropoulos A.
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr 02; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
    Schwindling FS, Hilgenfeld T, Weber D, Kosinski MA, Rammelsberg P, Tasaka A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec 02; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.