These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


190 related items for PubMed ID: 3913081

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The reliability of Doppler ultrasound techniques in the assessment of carotid disease.
    Ratliff DA, Hames TK, Humphries KN, Birch S, Chant AD.
    Angiology; 1985 Jun; 36(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 3896047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusion by Doppler ultrasound.
    Bornstein NM, Beloev ZG, Norris JW.
    Ann Surg; 1988 Mar; 207(3):315-7. PubMed ID: 3278698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Characterisation of carotid artery disease: comparison of duplex scanning with histology.
    Ratliff DA, Gallagher PJ, Hames TK, Humphries KN, Webster JH, Chant AD.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985 Mar; 11(6):835-40. PubMed ID: 3913082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The role of continuous wave Doppler imaging in a vascular unit.
    Hames TK, Humphries KN, Gazzard VM, Powell TV, McLellan DL.
    Cardiovasc Res; 1985 Oct; 19(10):631-5. PubMed ID: 3902235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Noninvasive differentiation of carotid artery occlusion from high-grade stenosis.
    Hill SL, Christie A, McDannald ER, Donato AT, Martin D.
    Am Surg; 1987 Feb; 53(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 3544989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Quantitative assessment of carotid artery disease by continuous wave and pulsed multigated Doppler--prospective comparison with angiography.
    Sillesen H, Neergaard K, Buchardt Hansen HJ.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988 Feb; 14(8):641-8. PubMed ID: 3062860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Symptomatic carotid ischaemic events: safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography, before carotid endarterectomy.
    Hankey GJ, Warlow CP.
    BMJ; 1990 Jun 09; 300(6738):1485-91. PubMed ID: 2115384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cerebrovascular evaluation: assessment of Doppler scanning of carotid arteries, ophthalmic Doppler flow and cervical bruits.
    Shoumaker RD, Bloch S.
    Stroke; 1978 Jun 09; 9(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 741486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the extracranial carotid arteries: correlation of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and conventional angiography.
    Mattle HP, Kent KC, Edelman RR, Atkinson DJ, Skillman JJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 1991 Jun 09; 13(6):838-44; discussion 844-5. PubMed ID: 2038105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of non-invasive methods in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease.
    Appleberg M, Chambers JL, Lane R.
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1982 Jun 09; 52(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 6954929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.