These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
310 related items for PubMed ID: 3913610
1. Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement. Eakle WS. Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):229-30. PubMed ID: 3913610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin. Trope M, Tronstad L. J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study. Desai PD, Das UK. Indian J Dent Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements. Torres-Sánchez C, Montoya-Salazar V, Córdoba P, Vélez C, Guzmán-Duran A, Gutierrez-Pérez JL, Torres-Lagares D. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of teeth with resin-bonded restorations. Stampalia LL, Nicholls JI, Brudvik JS, Jones DW. J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jun; 55(6):694-8. PubMed ID: 3522863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Jun; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial. Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF. J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with glass ionomer-composite resin systems. Joynt RB, Davis EL, Wieczkowski G, Williams DA. J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jul; 62(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 2746538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB. Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of three adhesive restorative systems on impact fracture of premolar teeth. Hood JA, Stokes AN, Chang AC, Pragji AM. Restorative Dent; 1987 Oct; 3(5):109-11. PubMed ID: 3507736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the fracture resistance of reattached incisor tooth fragments using 4 different materials. Singhal R, Pathak A. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 Oct; 30(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 23514683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The development of fracture toughness and fracture strength in posterior restorative materials. Lloyd CH, Adamson M. Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 3479357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Compression resistance in premolars with OM cavities and palatally excavated cusps when obturated]. Pérez Gutiérrez I, Navajas Rodríguez de Mondelo JM. Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Dec; 5(10):679-84. PubMed ID: 2640098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]