These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 39166285

  • 1. Effect of clinician's experience and expertise on the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the computed tomography-based classification systems in posterior malleolus fractures.
    Cırdı YU, Demirel M, Kayaalp ME, Öztürk Rİ, Bozoğlan M, Salvi AG.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2024 Jun 13; 58(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 39166285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computed tomography-based classifications of posterior malleolar fractures and their inter- and intraobserver reliability: a comparison of the Haraguchi, Bartoníček/Rammelt, and Mason classifications.
    Kleinertz H, Mueller E, Tessarzyk M, Frosch KH, Schlickewei C.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Dec 13; 142(12):3895-3902. PubMed ID: 35094134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Posterior Malleolar Fracture Assessment: An Independent Interobserver and Intraobserver Validation of Three Computed Tomography-Based Classifications.
    Morales S, Massri-Pugin J, Mery P, Palma J, Filippi J, Villa A.
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2023 Jan 01; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36622849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Dias-Tachdjian classification in pediatric ankle fractures: do clinical experience and expertise matter?
    Demirel M, Yenigün MY, Mert L, Kendirci AŞ, Yağci TF, Demir TB, Sağlam Y, Cirdi Y, Yağdiran B, Korkmazer B.
    J Pediatr Orthop B; 2024 May 01; 33(3):240-245. PubMed ID: 37266919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Computed Tomography-Based Classifications Used in Posterior Malleolar Fractures: The Haraguchi and Bartoníček-Rammelt Classifications.
    Turgut A, Egeli E, Altundağ Ü, Sarıekiz E, Erkuş S, Kalenderer Ö.
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2023 May 01; 113(4):. PubMed ID: 37713410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Validation of three classification systems for posterior malleolus fractures of the ankle.
    Rashid MS, Islam R, Marsden S, Trompeter A, Teoh KH.
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Aug 01; 33(6):2601-2608. PubMed ID: 36723774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reproducibility of Bartoníček and Haraguchi classifications of the posterior malleolus fractures.
    Sugrañes J, Lopez-Hervas S, Alvarez C, Gamba C.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Aug 01; 143(8):5001-5006. PubMed ID: 36905426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of ankle fracture classification systems in 193 trimalleolar ankle fractures.
    Pflüger P, Harder F, Müller K, Biberthaler P, Crönlein M.
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Oct 01; 48(5):4181-4188. PubMed ID: 35348840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impact of two- and three-dimensional computed tomography use on intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of pilon fracture classification and treatment recommendation.
    Byun SE, Choi W, Choi Y, Ahn TK, Kim HK, Yoon S, Lee J, Choi DS.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov 01; 105(7):1407-1412. PubMed ID: 31542310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ankle Fracture Classification: An Innovative System for Describing Ankle Fractures.
    Briet JP, Hietbrink F, Smeeing DP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 May 01; 58(3):492-496. PubMed ID: 30795890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Lauder AJ, Inda DJ, Bott AM, Clare MP, Fitzgibbons TC, Mormino MA.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr 01; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
    Glen LZQ, Wong JYS, Tay WX, Li TP, Phua SKA, Manohara R, Chee YH.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023 Apr 01; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
    Taşkesen A, Demirkale İ, Okkaoğlu MC, Özdemir M, Bilgili MG, Altay M.
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec 01; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Enhancing Consistency in Posterior Malleolus Fracture Classification: A Comprehensive Interobserver Reliability Study With 20 Raters Using the Mason & Molloy Classification.
    Theyvan Balakrishnan T, Bilal A, Fitzpatrick N, Dahiya R, Soelar SA, Khalid K, Pillai A.
    Cureus; 2023 Nov 01; 15(11):e48586. PubMed ID: 38024046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In Which Cases Do We Operate? Posterior Malleolar Fractures-Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Bartoníček/Rammelt Classification and Corresponding Surgery Rates.
    Sarter M, Krane F, Leschinger T, Hackl M, Müller LP, Harbrecht A.
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2024 May 10; ():19386400241250154. PubMed ID: 38726657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility?
    Wu S, Qian G, Huang Q, Dou B, Zheng Q, Wang W, Zhu X, Mei J.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jan 01; 482(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 37326487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A New Classification System for Pilon Fractures Based on CT Scan: An Independent Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation.
    Palma J, Villa A, Mery P, Abarca M, Mora A, Peña A, Urrutia J, Filippi J.
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Mar 01; 28(5):208-213. PubMed ID: 31800439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G, Leinardi L, Congia S, Frigau L, Mola F, Capone A.
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar 12; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    İmerci A, Aydogan NH, Tosun K.
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr 12; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of morphological Mutch classification for greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: A comparison of x-ray, two-, and three-dimensional CT imaging.
    Razaeian S, Askittou S, Wiese B, Zhang D, Harb A, Krettek C, Hawi N.
    PLoS One; 2021 Apr 12; 16(11):e0259646. PubMed ID: 34762694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.