These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
131 related items for PubMed ID: 39206233
1. Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Angle Obtained by Radiographic Methods and Manual Programming of Articulators in Dentate Patients - A Clinico-radiographic Study. Agrawal N, Rodrigues SJ, Mahesh M, Shetty TB, Pai UY, Saldanha S, Hegde P, Ahmed J, Srikant N. Contemp Clin Dent; 2024; 15(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 39206233 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients. Shetty S, Kunta M, Shenoy K. J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29430137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans. Prasad KD, Shah N, Hegde C. Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Oct; 3(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 23633793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance angles obtained using radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods. Kwon OK, Yang SW, Kim JH. J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):302-307. PubMed ID: 28874998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals. Das A, Muddugangadhar BC, Mawani DP, Mukhopadhyay A. J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study. Tannamala PK, Pulagam M, Pottem SR, Swapna B. J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of the Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Protrusive Interocclusal Records, OPG, and CBCT in Edentulous Patients: An In Vivo Study. Gheedle R, John P. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jun 01; 24(6):403-408. PubMed ID: 37534507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An in vivo study. Keerthana SR, Mohammed HS, Hariprasad A, Anand M, Ayesha S. J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021 Jun 01; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 34810368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients. Kumar CD, Selvaraj S, Mohan J, Raju R. Ann Afr Med; 2023 Jun 01; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of condylar inclination in dentulous subjects as determined by two radiographic methods: Orthopantomograph and cone-beam computed tomography - An in vivo study. Mawani D, Muddugangadhar BC, Das A, Mukhopadhyay A. J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019 Jun 01; 19(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31040544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]