These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 39215274

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial).
    Eid FY, El-Kenany WA, Mowafy MI, El-Kalza AR.
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun 05; 22(1):221. PubMed ID: 35659655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A, Júnior LG, Martins RP, Vianna AP.
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep 05; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jun 05; 153(6):771-785. PubMed ID: 29853235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M, Sharma V, Khanna B.
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun 05; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of piezocision on root resorption associated with orthodontic force: A microcomputed tomography study.
    Patterson BM, Dalci O, Papadopoulou AK, Madukuri S, Mahon J, Petocz P, Spahr A, Darendeliler MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan 05; 151(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 28024782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Cheng LL, Darendeliler MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug 05; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N, Davidovitch M, Sarne O, Panayi N, Vardimon AD.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan 05; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A, Sabbagh BA, Baskaradoss JK.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb 01; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Physical properties of root cementum: part 14. The amount of root resorption after force application for 12 weeks on maxillary and mandibular premolars: a microcomputed-tomography study.
    Paetyangkul A, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Jones AS, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct 01; 136(4):492.e1-9; discussion 492-3. PubMed ID: 19815148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comprehensive comparison of canine retraction using NiTi closed coil springs vs elastomeric chains.
    Barsoum HA, ElSayed HS, El Sharaby FA, Palomo JM, Mostafa YA.
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul 01; 91(4):441-448. PubMed ID: 34181721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Canine and molar movement, rotation and tipping by NiTi coils versus elastomeric chains in first maxillary premolar extraction orthodontic adolescents: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Hashemzadeh H, Soleimani M, Golbar M, Dehghani Soltani A, Mirmalek SP.
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar 01; 20(1):100601. PubMed ID: 34866026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Osteocalcin and cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen in gingival crevicular fluid during piezocision accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: A randomized split-mouth study.
    Yildirim HS, Ates M, Gun IO, Kuru B, Cakirer B, Kuru L.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Apr 01; 26(4):470-477. PubMed ID: 37203112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) cause long term acceleration in the rate of canine retraction? A split-mouth, two-arm parallel group, randomized control trial.
    Gupta S, Bhambri E, Sharma M, Shaikh MA, Zope A, Thoke B, Sorokhaibam M.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2023 Apr 01; 28(5):e232388. PubMed ID: 37937683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Non-surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
    El-Angbawi A, McIntyre G, Fleming PS, Bearn D.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Jun 20; 6(6):CD010887. PubMed ID: 37339352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of maxillary incisors' retraction in orthodontic space closure: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Mordente CM, Oliveira DD, Palomo JM, Cardoso PA, Assis MAL, Zenóbio EG, Souki BQ, Soares RV.
    Prog Orthod; 2024 Feb 12; 25(1):6. PubMed ID: 38342823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pulp volume changes after piezocision-assisted tooth movement: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hatrom AA, Howait MS, Zawawi KH, Al-Turki GA, Alansari RA, Almehayawi NF, Alammari SH, Mohammed RA, Hassan AH.
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan 13; 21(1):28. PubMed ID: 33435897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effectiveness of a low-intensity static magnetic field in accelerating upper canine retraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Alqaisi NN, Haddad RA, Amasha HM.
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr 06; 24(1):424. PubMed ID: 38582881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.