These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 39285022

  • 1. Assessing functional and radiological outcomes: open reduction and internal fixation vs. minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humerus shaft fractures - a prospective comparative study.
    Sugumar N, Sathiyaseelan N, Purushothaman JR, Natarajan S.
    Int Orthop; 2024 Nov; 48(11):2979-2991. PubMed ID: 39285022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of post-operative numbness and patient satisfaction using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open plating for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures.
    You JM, Wu YS, Wang Y.
    Int J Surg; 2018 Aug; 56():21-25. PubMed ID: 29890301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with a locking compression plate is superior to open reduction and internal fixation in the management of the proximal humerus fractures.
    Lin T, Xiao B, Ma X, Fu D, Yang S.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Jun 16; 15():206. PubMed ID: 24934152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A prospective randomized study of operative treatment for noncomminuted humeral shaft fractures: conventional open plating versus minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis.
    Kim JW, Oh CW, Byun YS, Kim JJ, Park KC.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Apr 16; 29(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 25210833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of distal fibula Danis-Weber types B and C fractures.
    Marazzi C, Wittauer M, Hirschmann MT, Testa EA.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Oct 22; 15(1):491. PubMed ID: 33092616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Is minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis superior to open plating for fixation of two-part fracture of the proximal humerus?
    Kim YG, Park KH, Kim JW, Oh JK, Yoon JP, Kim HJ, Oh CW.
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019 Oct 22; 27(2):2309499019836156. PubMed ID: 30885047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison between osteosynthesis with interlocking nail and minimally invasive plating for proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures.
    Wang Y, Chen H, Wang L, Chen X, Zhi X, Cui J, Cao L.
    Int Orthop; 2021 Aug 22; 45(8):2093-2102. PubMed ID: 33184684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Conservative Management with Functional Brace Versus Various Surgical Fixation Techniques for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zavras AG, Monahan KT, Winek NC, Pan T, Altman GT, Altman DT, Westrick ER.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Jul 19; 105(14):1112-1122. PubMed ID: 37224234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A Prospective Randomized Study on Operative Treatment for Simple Distal Tibial Fractures-Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Minimal Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.
    Kim JW, Kim HU, Oh CW, Kim JW, Park KC.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Jan 19; 32(1):e19-e24. PubMed ID: 28834822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.