These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
139 related items for PubMed ID: 39287731
1. Agreement between manual and automatic ultrasound measurement of the velocity-time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract in intensive care patients: evaluation of the AUTO-VTI® tool. Louart B, Muller L, Emond B, Boulet N, Roger C. J Clin Monit Comput; 2024 Sep 17. PubMed ID: 39287731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert: A comparison of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) assessment between ICU doctors and an AI tool. Zhai S, Wang H, Sun L, Zhang B, Huo F, Qiu S, Wu X, Ma J, Wu Y, Duan J. J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug 17; 23(8):e13724. PubMed ID: 35816461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients. Damodaran S, Kulkarni AV, Gunaseelan V, Raj V, Kanchi M. Indian J Anaesth; 2022 May 17; 66(5):368-374. PubMed ID: 35782660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is There a Correlation Between Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral and Stroke Volume Index in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery? Isogai H, Ogasawara O. Cureus; 2022 Jul 17; 14(7):e27257. PubMed ID: 36039242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between corrected carotid flow time and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral using a novel technique. Cheong I, Merlo PM, Tamagnone FM. J Clin Ultrasound; 2024 Sep 18. PubMed ID: 39291774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the lowest change in cardiac output that transthoracic echocardiography can detect? Jozwiak M, Mercado P, Teboul JL, Benmalek A, Gimenez J, Dépret F, Richard C, Monnet X. Crit Care; 2019 Apr 11; 23(1):116. PubMed ID: 30971307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Accuracy of Velocity-Time Integral Variation and Peak Velocity Variation of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Postoperative Patients Mechanically Ventilated at Low Tidal Volumes. Xie J, Wan J, Xu L, Zhang Y, Chen J. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2023 Jun 11; 37(6):911-918. PubMed ID: 36931906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of correlation between left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and stroke volume index in mechanically ventilated patients. Blancas R, Martínez-González Ó, Ballesteros D, Núñez A, Luján J, Rodríguez-Serrano D, Hernández A, Martínez-Díaz C, Parra CM, Matamala BL, Alonso MA, Chana M. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2019 Mar 11; 43(2):73-78. PubMed ID: 29428185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the accuracy of cardiac output using POCUS: the introduction of artificial intelligence into routine care. Shaikh F, Kenny JE, Awan O, Markovic D, Friedman O, He T, Singh S, Yan P, Qadir N, Barjaktarevic I. Ultrasound J; 2022 Dec 14; 14(1):47. PubMed ID: 36517635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Passive leg raising test to predict fluid responsiveness using the right ventricle outflow tract velocity-time integral through a subcostal view. Cheong I, Otero Castro V, Brizuela M, Früchtenicht MF, Merlo PM, Tamagnone FM. J Ultrasound; 2022 Sep 21. PubMed ID: 36127570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial Intelligence (AI) versus POCUS Expert: A Validation Study of Three Automatic AI-Based, Real-Time, Hemodynamic Echocardiographic Assessment Tools. Gohar E, Herling A, Mazuz M, Tsaban G, Gat T, Kobal S, Fuchs L. J Clin Med; 2023 Feb 08; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36835888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A modified subcostal view: a novel method for measuring the LVOT VTI. Cheong I, Castro VO, Gómez RA, Merlo PM, Tamagnone FM. J Ultrasound; 2023 Jun 08; 26(2):429-434. PubMed ID: 35449385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral versus inferior vena cava collapsibility index in predicting post-induction hypotension during general anesthesia: an observational study. Sharma V, Sharma A, Sethi A, Pathania J. Acute Crit Care; 2024 Feb 08; 39(1):117-126. PubMed ID: 38476064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of assessing velocity time integral at different locations across ventricular outflow tracts when calculating cardiac output in neonates. Huang J, Singh Y, Adie M, Noori S, Ebrahimi M, Durand M, Cayabyab R, Ramanathan R. Eur J Pediatr; 2023 Oct 08; 182(10):4433-4441. PubMed ID: 37490109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. End-expiratory Occlusion Test and Mini-fluid Challenge Test for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Acute Circulatory Failure. Selvam V, Shende D, Anand RK, Kashyap L, Ray BR. J Emerg Trauma Shock; 2023 Oct 08; 16(3):109-115. PubMed ID: 38025504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference intervals and percentile curve for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), velocity time integral (VTI), and LVOT-VTI-derived hemodynamic parameters in healthy children and adolescents: Analysis of echocardiographic methods association and agreement. Díaz A, Zócalo Y, Cabrera-Fischer E, Bia D. Echocardiography; 2018 Dec 08; 35(12):2014-2034. PubMed ID: 30376592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral outperforms ejection fraction and Doppler-derived cardiac output for predicting outcomes in a select advanced heart failure cohort. Tan C, Rubenson D, Srivastava A, Mohan R, Smith MR, Billick K, Bardarian S, Thomas Heywood J. Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2017 Jul 03; 15(1):18. PubMed ID: 28673293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]