These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 39352408

  • 1. Comparison of Elisar-Fast and Sita-Fast Strategy for Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma.
    Narang P, Rasheed FF, Agarwal A, Narang R, Agarwal A.
    J Glaucoma; 2024 Oct 02. PubMed ID: 39352408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Srinivasan M, Agarwal A.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun 02; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang R, Sundaramoorthy L.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun 02; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma].
    Nordmann JP, Brion F, Hamard P, Mouton-Chopin D.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct 02; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ, Taguri A, Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun 02; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
    Tan JCK, Agar A, Kalloniatis M, Phu J.
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun 02; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.
    Nazareth T, Rocha J, Scoralick ALB, Dias DT, Gracitelli CPB, Kanadani FN, Prata TS.
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun 02; 14():4201-4207. PubMed ID: 33299296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J, Wang H, Kalloniatis M.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan 02; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T, Eslani M, Weinreb RN, Arias J, Vasile C, Mohammadzadeh V, Moghimi S.
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb 01; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X, Herman K, Van Malderen L, Devos M, Spileers W.
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001 Feb 01; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V, Kong GXY, Singh A, Panigrahi A, Gupta S, Prea S, Vingrys AJ.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May 01; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative quantification of focal and diffuse visual field loss by the SPARK Precision threshold algorithm and SITA.
    Foo SK, Cubbidge RP, Heitmar R.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun 01; 260(6):1983-1993. PubMed ID: 34962591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of Advanced Threshold and SITA Fast Perimetric Strategies.
    Sikorski BL, Laudencka A.
    J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun 01; 2020():7139649. PubMed ID: 33489341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Prea SM, Kong YXG, Mehta A, He M, Crowston JG, Gupta V, Martin KR, Vingrys AJ.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun 01; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun 01; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Montesano G, Bryan SR, Crabb DP, Fogagnolo P, Oddone F, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Lanzetta P, Perdicchi A, Johnson CA, Garway-Heath DF, Brusini P, Rossetti LM.
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb 01; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Faster algorithms to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression model in glaucoma: comparison with SITA-Fast.
    Hirasawa K, Murata H, Shimada S, Matsuno M, Shoji N, Asaoka R.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul 01; 107(7):946-952. PubMed ID: 35232725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls.
    Schulz AM, Graham EC, You Y, Klistorner A, Graham SL.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 May 01; 46(4):346-355. PubMed ID: 28976067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.